Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2882▼ 181 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1279▼ 60 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)5▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)487▼ 22 respecto a la semana anterior
4 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Alta (8.2) | 0.19% | — | Motorola Mtm5500 FirmwareMotorola Mtm5400 Firmware | 19/10/2023 | 17/6/2026 | Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack properly configured memory protection of pages shared between the OMAP-L138 ARM and DSP cores. The SoC provides two memory protection units, MPU1 and MPU2, to enforce the trust boundary between the two cores. Since both units are left unconfigured by the firmwares, an adversary… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 0.35% | — | Motorola Mtm5500 FirmwareMotorola Mtm5400 Firmware | 19/10/2023 | 17/6/2026 | The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares generate TETRA authentication challenges using a PRNG using a tick count register as its sole entropy source. Low boottime entropy and limited re-seeding of the pool renders the authentication challenge vulnerable to two attacks. First, due to the limited boottime pool entropy, an… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.2) | 0.21% | — | Motorola Mtm5500 FirmwareMotorola Mtm5400 Firmware | 19/10/2023 | 17/6/2026 | The Motorola MTM5000 series firmwares lack pointer validation on arguments passed to trusted execution environment (TEE) modules. Two modules are used, one responsible for KVL key management and the other for TETRA cryptographic functionality. In both modules, an adversary with non-secure supervisor level code… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 0.36% | — | Motorola Mtm5500 FirmwareMotorola Mtm5400 Firmware | 19/10/2023 | 17/6/2026 | A format string vulnerability exists in Motorola MTM5000 series firmware AT command handler for the AT+CTGL command. An attacker-controllable string is improperly handled, allowing for a write-anything-anywhere scenario. This can be leveraged to obtain arbitrary code execution inside the teds_app binary, which runs… |