« Volver al listado

CVE-2026-98372

Estado: RecibidaSin puntuar—

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: iptfs: fix stack OOB read in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk()

iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() advances to the fragment containing @offset with an unbounded loop:

walk->fragi is advanced and walk->frags[walk->fragi] is dereferenced without ever checking fragi against walk->nr_frags. When the requested offset is at or beyond the total length spanned by the walk's fragments, fragi runs past nr_frags and off the end of the fixed-size on-stack frags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] array, reading out-of-bounds stack memory.

The two callers behave differently: iptfs_skb_add_frags() already guards against this with

Leer descripción completaMostrar menos

but iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() has no such guard and calls iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() unconditionally, so it performs the out-of-range walk. Its own "fragi < walk->nr_frags" bound check runs only afterwards, too late to prevent the read.

This is reachable from the receive path: a crafted IP-TFS (AGGFRAG) payload delivered to an IPTFS SA drives iptfs_reassem_cont() -> iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() with an offset past the fragment total, e.g.:

Give iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() the same up-front guard that iptfs_skb_add_frags() already has, so the walk is never entered with an out-of-range offset. When it triggers, the caller falls back to the existing linearize-and-copy path, which is safe.

Detalles técnicos trazas, registros y código del informe original
	while (offset >= walk->past + walk->frags[walk->fragi].len)
		walk->past += walk->frags[walk->fragi++].len;

	if (!walk->nr_frags ||
	    offset >= walk->total + walk->initial_offset)
		return len;

  BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250
  Read of size 4 at addr ffff888008ad7210 by task repro/345
   iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:392
   iptfs_skb_can_add_frags+0x155/0x310  net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:420
   iptfs_reassem_cont+0xcf8/0x1140      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:902
   iptfs_input_ordered+0x552/0x670      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1280
   iptfs_input+0x3d6/0xde0              net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1741
   xfrm_input+0x282f/0x6140             net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:700
   xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x93/0x120             net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c:104
   ip_rcv+0x278/0x2d0                   net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612

CVSS

NVD no ha asignado puntuación CVSS a esta CVE (habitual desde el cambio de política de abril de 2026).

Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).

Tecnologías afectadas (1)

⚠ Inferidas por IA a partir de la descripción — NVD aún no ha analizado esta CVE; no son CPE verificados.

Referencias

JSON original (NVD)

Mostrar
{
  "id": "CVE-2026-98372",
  "cveTags": [],
  "metrics": {},
  "affected": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "product": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5f2b6a9095743a6bf1f34c43c4fe78fa8bdf5ad7",
              "lessThan": "7e1c6884a0b494b7e3f204877f94c1e07a117bf7",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5f2b6a9095743a6bf1f34c43c4fe78fa8bdf5ad7",
              "lessThan": "da56d0ee93d1bad779b0486f2fab92d1bc1f0cf3",
              "versionType": "git"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5f2b6a9095743a6bf1f34c43c4fe78fa8bdf5ad7",
              "lessThan": "d042487dc118e494db2e2c1382310255c90ff544",
              "versionType": "git"
            }
          ],
          "programFiles": [
            "net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected"
        },
        {
          "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
          "vendor": "Linux",
          "product": "Linux",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.14"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0",
              "lessThan": "6.14",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "6.18.54",
              "versionType": "semver",
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.2.8",
              "versionType": "semver",
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "7.3-rc4",
              "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix",
              "lessThanOrEqual": "*"
            }
          ],
          "programFiles": [
            "net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "affected"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "published": "2026-10-06T09:18:31.743",
  "references": [
    {
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e1c6884a0b494b7e3f204877f94c1e07a117bf7",
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d042487dc118e494db2e2c1382310255c90ff544",
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da56d0ee93d1bad779b0486f2fab92d1bc1f0cf3",
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
    }
  ],
  "vulnStatus": "Received",
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfrm: iptfs: fix stack OOB read in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk()\n\niptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() advances to the fragment containing @offset\nwith an unbounded loop:\n\n\twhile (offset >= walk->past + walk->frags[walk->fragi].len)\n\t\twalk->past += walk->frags[walk->fragi++].len;\n\nwalk->fragi is advanced and walk->frags[walk->fragi] is dereferenced\nwithout ever checking fragi against walk->nr_frags. When the requested\noffset is at or beyond the total length spanned by the walk's fragments,\nfragi runs past nr_frags and off the end of the fixed-size on-stack\nfrags[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] array, reading out-of-bounds stack memory.\n\nThe two callers behave differently: iptfs_skb_add_frags() already guards\nagainst this with\n\n\tif (!walk->nr_frags ||\n\t    offset >= walk->total + walk->initial_offset)\n\t\treturn len;\n\nbut iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() has no such guard and calls\niptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk() unconditionally, so it performs the\nout-of-range walk. Its own \"fragi < walk->nr_frags\" bound check runs only\nafterwards, too late to prevent the read.\n\nThis is reachable from the receive path: a crafted IP-TFS (AGGFRAG)\npayload delivered to an IPTFS SA drives iptfs_reassem_cont() ->\niptfs_skb_can_add_frags() with an offset past the fragment total, e.g.:\n\n  BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250\n  Read of size 4 at addr ffff888008ad7210 by task repro/345\n   iptfs_skb_reset_frag_walk+0x235/0x250 net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:392\n   iptfs_skb_can_add_frags+0x155/0x310  net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:420\n   iptfs_reassem_cont+0xcf8/0x1140      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:902\n   iptfs_input_ordered+0x552/0x670      net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1280\n   iptfs_input+0x3d6/0xde0              net/xfrm/xfrm_iptfs.c:1741\n   xfrm_input+0x282f/0x6140             net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c:700\n   xfrm4_esp_rcv+0x93/0x120             net/ipv4/xfrm4_protocol.c:104\n   ip_rcv+0x278/0x2d0                   net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612\n\nGive iptfs_skb_can_add_frags() the same up-front guard that\niptfs_skb_add_frags() already has, so the walk is never entered with an\nout-of-range offset. When it triggers, the caller falls back to the\nexisting linearize-and-copy path, which is safe."
    }
  ],
  "lastModified": "2026-10-06T09:18:31.743",
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}