CVE-2026-78163
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.
DoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.
Read full descriptionShow less
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation.
CVSS
- Base score
- 5.9
- Version
- 3.1
- Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Exploitation probability (EPSS)
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days
- 0.42 %
- Percentile among all scored CVEs
- 35
- Score date
- 10/20/2026
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST) estimates how likely a vulnerability is to be exploited in the wild within 30 days. It complements CVSS (impact) and CISA KEV (confirmed exploitation).
Public exploits
Exploit code or detection templates are publicly available. This is not the same as confirmed active exploitation (KEV), but it raises the risk: patch with priority.
- Proof of concept on GitHub (unverified) · List of proofs of concept on GitHub
⚠️ GitHub proofs of concept are not verified: some are fake or contain malware. Never run them outside an isolated lab.
ATT&CK techniques
How this vulnerability is exploited and what the attacker gains, in MITRE ATT&CK terms.
- Exploitation
T1190Exploit Public-Facing Applicationinitial access90 % - Primary impact
T1005Data from Local Systemcollection85 % - Secondary impact
T1090Proxycommand and control80 %
Vector AV:N/PR:N/UI:N: el cuerpo del mensaje con prefijo http(s):// se trata como URL remota (SSRF) y con / o barra invertida como fichero local (path traversal, C:H).
Inferred by our analysis agent from the official description, CVSS vector and CWE, and checked by a supervisor. May contain errors.
ATT&CK mitigations that cover these techniques
Affected technologies (1)
⚠ AI-inferred from the description — NVD hasn't analyzed this CVE yet, these aren't verified CPEs.
CWEs
- CWE-22, CWE-200, CWE-918
References
Raw JSON (NVD)
Show
{
"id": "CVE-2026-78163",
"cveTags": [],
"metrics": {
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78163",
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"version": "2.0.3",
"timestamp": "2026-10-19T18:47:11.066796Z"
}
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "security@apache.org",
"cvssData": {
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"version": "3.1",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"impactScore": 3.6,
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2
}
]
},
"affected": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"affectedData": [
{
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"product": "Apache Camel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.15.0",
"lessThan": "4.18.5",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.19.0",
"lessThan": "4.22.1",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.5",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.22.1",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.23.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
],
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.apache.camel/camel-docling",
"packageName": "org.apache.camel:camel-docling",
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected"
}
]
}
],
"published": "2026-10-19T11:17:19.233",
"references": [
{
"url": "https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78163.html",
"source": "security@apache.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25596",
"source": "security@apache.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25733",
"source": "security@apache.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25744",
"source": "security@apache.org"
},
{
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24422",
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "security@apache.org",
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-22"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.\n\n\n\nDoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation."
}
],
"lastModified": "2026-10-19T20:45:51.597",
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org"
}