« Volver al listado

CVE-2026-75805

Estado: En análisisMedia (5.3)—

Issue summary: A CMP client that requests certificate revocation on the basis of a PKCS#10 CSR may dereference a NULL pointer and terminate abnormally when processing a crafted revocation response.

Impact summary: The NULL pointer dereference happens on a read which leads to a crash and a Denial of Service for the affected client application.

CWE: CWE-476: NULL-pointer dereference

Description: A CMP client revoking a certificate has to tell the server which certificate to revoke, and may do so by supplying a PKCS#10 CSR instead of the certificate itself or its issuer name and serial number. This is 'openssl cmp -cmd rr -csr <file>' on the command line, or OSSL_CMP_exec_RR_ses() with the certificate supplied via OSSL_CMP_CTX_set1_p10CSR() through the API.

Leer descripción completaMostrar menos

A CSR does not contain the issuer name and serial number of the certificate, so the client does not send them. A server may optionally name the certificate it revoked in its response, and the client then compares that name against what it sent. Having sent neither an issuer name nor a serial number, it has nothing to compare against, and a server returning a specially crafted name causes the client to read from a NULL pointer and crash.

The revocation response is checked for valid message protection before the affected code is reached, so an attacker must be a malicious or compromised CMP server, or a man-in-the-middle in possession of the secret used for message protection. Clients that identify the certificate to be revoked by a certificate or by issuer and serial number rather than by a PKCS#10 CSR are not affected.

FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS

Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).

🎯 Técnicas ATT&CK

Cómo se explota esta vulnerabilidad y qué consigue el atacante, en el lenguaje de MITRE ATT&CK.

Cliente CMP vulnerable a denegación de servicio por desreferencia de NULL al procesar respuesta de revocación malformada de servidor CMP comprometido (AV:N, AC:L, sin autenticación requerida).

Inferido por nuestro agente de análisis a partir de la descripción oficial, el vector CVSS y la CWE, y comprobado por un supervisor. Puede contener errores.

🛡️ Mitigaciones ATT&CK que cubren estas técnicas

Filter Network TrafficVulnerability ScanningPrivileged Account ManagementNetwork SegmentationLimit Access to Resource Over NetworkApplication Isolation and Sandboxing

Tecnologías afectadas (1)

⚠ Inferidas por IA a partir de la descripción — NVD aún no ha analizado esta CVE; no son CPE verificados.

Openssl — OpensslAI

CWE

Referencias

JSON original (NVD)

Mostrar
{
  "id": "CVE-2026-75805",
  "cveTags": [],
  "metrics": {
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-75805",
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "version": "2.0.3",
          "timestamp": "2026-09-29T16:54:03.315064Z"
        }
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "type": "Secondary",
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "cvssData": {
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "version": "3.1",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE"
        },
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9
      }
    ]
  },
  "affected": [
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.0.0",
              "lessThan": "4.0.3",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "lessThan": "3.6.5",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "lessThan": "3.5.9",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.4.0",
              "lessThan": "3.4.8",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "lessThan": "3.0.23",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "published": "2026-09-29T16:17:11.063",
  "references": [
    {
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7588db7fef14209c3caa3a101d11a02006b19166",
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7ca0ccb5172a577e9b87267d77bfe21e5481a5e7",
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9eb2a8a9b86136cdb39d6d7d50644dd66941cdc3",
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/abf02872a4b71767ecc72293424420f5b009190f",
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt",
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
    }
  ],
  "vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "type": "Secondary",
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-476"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Issue summary: A CMP client that requests certificate revocation on the basis\nof a PKCS#10 CSR may dereference a NULL pointer and terminate abnormally when\nprocessing a crafted revocation response. \n\nImpact summary: The NULL pointer dereference happens on a read which \nleads to a crash and a Denial of Service for the affected client application.\n\nCWE: CWE-476: NULL-pointer dereference\n\nDescription: A CMP client revoking a certificate has to tell the server which\ncertificate to revoke, and may do so by supplying a PKCS#10 CSR instead of the\ncertificate itself or its issuer name and serial number. This is\n'openssl cmp -cmd rr -csr <file>' on the command line, or\nOSSL_CMP_exec_RR_ses() with the certificate supplied via\nOSSL_CMP_CTX_set1_p10CSR() through the API.\n\nA CSR does not contain the issuer name and serial number of the certificate,\nso the client does not send them. A server may optionally name the\ncertificate it revoked in its response, and the client then compares that\nname against what it sent. Having sent neither an issuer name nor a serial\nnumber, it has nothing to compare against, and a server returning a specially\ncrafted name causes the client to read from a NULL pointer and crash.\n\nThe revocation response is checked for valid message protection before\nthe affected code is reached, so an attacker must be a malicious or\ncompromised CMP server, or a man-in-the-middle in possession of the\nsecret used for message protection. Clients that identify the certificate\nto be revoked by a certificate or by issuer and serial number rather\nthan by a PKCS#10 CSR are not affected.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nNo FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol\nimplementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
    }
  ],
  "lastModified": "2026-09-29T21:27:41.130",
  "sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
}