CVE-2026-68473
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/uaccess: correct check for CONFIG_PPC_E500 in mask_user_address()
mask_user_address() incorrectly checks for CONFIG_E500 instead of CONFIG_PPC_E500, causing mask_user_address_isel() to not be used on E500 hardware. Fix the check to use the correct name.
CVSS
- Versión: 3.1
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Puntuación base: 7.8
Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)
- Probabilidad de explotación en los próximos 30 días: 0.17%
- Percentil entre todas las CVEs puntuadas: 5
- Fecha de la puntuación: 6/10/2026
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).
🎯 Técnicas ATT&CK
Cómo se explota esta vulnerabilidad y qué consigue el atacante, en el lenguaje de MITRE ATT&CK.
- Explotación
T1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalationprivilege escalation85 % - Impacto principal
T1059Command and Scripting Interpreterexecution75 % - Impacto secundario
T1078Valid Accountsstealth · persistence · privilege escalation · initial access65 %
AV:L + PR:L sin UI indica escalada local de privilegios. El defecto en mask_user_address() permite bypass de protecciones de memoria en E500, permitiendo ejecución de código o acceso a datos de kernel con privilegios elevados.
Inferido por nuestro agente de análisis a partir de la descripción oficial, el vector CVSS y la CWE, y comprobado por un supervisor. Puede contener errores.
🛡️ Mitigaciones ATT&CK que cubren estas técnicas
Tecnologías afectadas (1)
⚠ Inferidas por IA a partir de la descripción — NVD aún no ha analizado esta CVE; no son CPE verificados.
Referencias
JSON original (NVD)
Mostrar
{
"id": "CVE-2026-68473",
"cveTags": [],
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"cvssData": {
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"version": "3.1",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"impactScore": 5.9,
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8
}
]
},
"affected": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"affectedData": [
{
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"product": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "861574d51bbd7a06dbf07f658a9a8def012c2f74",
"lessThan": "d5c234774a82f27b594f70c15fc45ce3648e4295",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "861574d51bbd7a06dbf07f658a9a8def012c2f74",
"lessThan": "d610d3ab18197d87618da11ec5fe8b3cebf32208",
"versionType": "git"
}
],
"programFiles": [
"arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected"
},
{
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"product": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"lessThan": "7.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.5",
"versionType": "semver",
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix",
"lessThanOrEqual": "*"
}
],
"programFiles": [
"arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected"
}
]
}
],
"published": "2026-08-15T06:20:29.240",
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5c234774a82f27b594f70c15fc45ce3648e4295",
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d610d3ab18197d87618da11ec5fe8b3cebf32208",
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npowerpc/uaccess: correct check for CONFIG_PPC_E500 in mask_user_address()\n\nmask_user_address() incorrectly checks for CONFIG_E500 instead of\nCONFIG_PPC_E500, causing mask_user_address_isel() to not be used on\nE500 hardware. Fix the check to use the correct name."
}
],
"lastModified": "2026-08-17T06:17:56.737",
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}