CVE-2026-14457
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
Leer descripción completaMostrar menos
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVSS
- Versión: 3.1
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Puntuación base: 7.5
Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)
- Probabilidad de explotación en los próximos 30 días: 1.02%
- Percentil entre todas las CVEs puntuadas: 62
- Fecha de la puntuación: 6/10/2026
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).
🎯 Técnicas ATT&CK
Cómo se explota esta vulnerabilidad y qué consigue el atacante, en el lenguaje de MITRE ATT&CK.
- Explotación
T1190Exploit Public-Facing Applicationinitial access75 % - Impacto principal
T1499.004Application or System Exploitationimpact85 %
Vulnerabilidad remota (AV:N, PR:N, UI:N) en OpenSSL con RFC7250 que causa NULL pointer dereference y denial of service cuando el peer remoto envía extensión TLS malformada; sin ejecución de código.
Inferido por nuestro agente de análisis a partir de la descripción oficial, el vector CVSS y la CWE, y comprobado por un supervisor. Puede contener errores.
🛡️ Mitigaciones ATT&CK que cubren estas técnicas
Tecnologías afectadas (1)
CWE
- CWE-476
Referencias
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1e8c398db67404babd3e5af999bb6bd86f720c76
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/581aaa0f0a35d214740f0fe1f5283ec41f1212e1
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d0af20478688a6aa2f59d61caa3f82136b181d7f
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dad836b071da6579510c968615848ba03cac593b
- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt
JSON original (NVD)
Mostrar
{
"id": "CVE-2026-14457",
"cveTags": [],
"metrics": {
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-14457",
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"version": "2.0.3",
"timestamp": "2026-08-25T14:13:25.034178Z"
}
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"cvssData": {
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"version": "3.1",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE"
},
"impactScore": 3.6,
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9
}
]
},
"affected": [
{
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"affectedData": [
{
"vendor": "OpenSSL",
"product": "OpenSSL",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"lessThan": "4.0.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.6.0",
"lessThan": "3.6.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.5.0",
"lessThan": "3.5.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"lessThan": "3.4.7",
"versionType": "semver"
}
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected"
}
]
}
],
"published": "2026-08-25T13:17:49.533",
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1e8c398db67404babd3e5af999bb6bd86f720c76",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/581aaa0f0a35d214740f0fe1f5283ec41f1212e1",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d0af20478688a6aa2f59d61caa3f82136b181d7f",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dad836b071da6579510c968615848ba03cac593b",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
},
{
"url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
}
],
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-476"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)\nenabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,\na NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and\nalso sends the typically omitted \"signature_algorithms_cert\" TLS extension.\n\nImpact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of\nan application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.\n\nCWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference\n\nDescription: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests\nthat key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration\nis to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or\nsigned by any convenient CA).\n\nWhen the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the\n\"signature_algorithms_cert\" extension is handled reliably even without the\nfix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be\nable to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding\ncertificate or its public key.\n\nDeployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate\nneed to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.\n\nFIPS impact: no\n\nNo FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation\nis outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary."
}
],
"lastModified": "2026-09-11T21:14:35.873",
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"negate": false,
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true,
"matchCriteriaId": "216D6529-561A-4684-A886-50954FBEBFB2",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.4.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.4.0"
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true,
"matchCriteriaId": "C5BB9E95-09B6-4163-B51C-D62B528A04DA",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.5.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.5.0"
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true,
"matchCriteriaId": "B1416826-F2F1-4EA8-9FB2-A56B0DA923C1",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.6.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.6.0"
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true,
"matchCriteriaId": "63B8F45B-E44F-481C-815D-AF9CA89C48F6",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.0.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org"
}