Electriccoin
Electriccoin Zcashd: vulnerabilidades y CVE
Electriccoin Zcashd tiene 5 vulnerabilidades publicadas, 3 de ellas en los últimos 12 meses. 2 son críticas y 0 figuran en el catálogo de explotación activa de CISA.
CVE5
Últimos 12 meses3
Críticas2
Explotadas activamente0
Todas las vulnerabilidades en el catálogo →⭐ Seguir esta tecnología
Últimas vulnerabilidades
| CVE | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Publicada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-52735 | Crítica (9.3) | 0.51% | — | 18 ago 2026 | ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, Zebra can accept a block that zcashd rejects because the P2SH signature-operation counter undercounts redeem scripts containing a disabled opcode followed… |
| CVE-2026-54496 | Crítica (9.3) | 0.32% | — | 17 jul 2026 | ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad 5.0.0, halo2_gadgets 0.5.0, orchard 0.14.0, zcash_primitives 0.28.0, and zcashd 6.20.0, the variable-base scalar multiplication gadget in… |
| CVE-2026-35679 | Baja (3.5) | 0.25% | — | 5 abr 2026 | Zcash zcashd before 6.12.0 allows invalid transactions to be accepted under certain conditions, which potentially could have resulted in the draining of user funds from the Sprout pool. It was sometimes not verifying… |
| CVE-2020-8807 | Media (5.3) | 1.0% | — | 5 feb 2021 | In Electric Coin Company Zcashd before 2.1.1-1, the time offset between messages could be leveraged to obtain sensitive information about the relationship between a suspected victim's address and an IP address, aka a… |
| CVE-2020-8806 | Alta (7.5) | 1.0% | — | 5 feb 2021 | Electric Coin Company Zcashd before 2.1.1-1 allows attackers to trigger consensus failure and double spending. A valid chain could be incorrectly rejected because timestamp requirements on block headers were not… |
🎯 Cómo se explota (técnicas ATT&CK)
Número de CVE de esta tecnología asignadas a cada técnica de explotación o de impacto principal.