Altran
Altran Picotcp: vulnerabilities and CVEs
Altran Picotcp has 13 published vulnerabilities, 0 of them in the last 12 months. 5 are rated critical and 0 are listed by CISA as actively exploited.
CVEs13
Last 12 months0
Critical5
Actively exploited0
All vulnerabilities in the catalogue →⭐ Follow this technology
Latest vulnerabilities
| CVE | Severity | EPSS | Active exploitation | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-30463 | High (7.5) | 0.87% | — | Apr 19, 2023 | Altran picoTCP through 1.7.0 allows memory corruption (and subsequent denial of service) because of an integer overflow in pico_ipv6_alloc when processing large ICMPv6 packets. This affects installations with Ethernet… |
| CVE-2021-33304 | Critical (9.8) | 0.84% | — | Feb 15, 2023 | Double Free vulnerability in virtualsquare picoTCP v1.7.0 and picoTCP-NG v2.1 in modules/pico_fragments.c in function pico_fragments_reassemble, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2020-24341 | Critical (9.1) | 5.0% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. The TCP input data processing function in pico_tcp.c does not validate the length of incoming TCP packets, which leads to an out-of-bounds read when… |
| CVE-2020-24340 | High (7.5) | 2.9% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. The code that processes DNS responses in pico_mdns_handle_data_as_answers_generic() in pico_mdns.c does not check whether the number of answers/responses… |
| CVE-2020-24339 | High (7.5) | 2.8% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. The DNS domain name record decompression functionality in pico_dns_decompress_name() in pico_dns_common.c does not validate the compression pointer offset… |
| CVE-2020-24338 | Critical (9.8) | 37% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP through 1.7.0. The DNS domain name record decompression functionality in pico_dns_decompress_name() in pico_dns_common.c does not validate the compression pointer offset values with… |
| CVE-2020-24337 | High (7.5) | 2.9% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. When an unsupported TCP option with zero length is provided in an incoming TCP packet, it is possible to cause a Denial-of-Service by achieving an… |
| CVE-2020-17445 | High (7.5) | 2.9% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 destination options does not check for a valid length of the destination options header. This results in an Out-of-Bounds Read, and, depending… |
| CVE-2020-17444 | High (7.5) | 2.8% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The routine for processing the next header field (and deducing whether the IPv6 extension headers are valid) doesn't check whether the header extension length field would… |
| CVE-2020-17443 | High (7.5) | 2.8% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for creating an ICMPv6 echo replies doesn't check whether the ICMPv6 echo request packet's size is shorter than 8 bytes. If the size of the incoming ICMPv6 request… |
| CVE-2020-17442 | High (7.5) | 3.1% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for parsing the hop-by-hop IPv6 extension headers does not validate the bounds of the extension header length value, which may result in Integer Wraparound. Therefore,… |
| CVE-2020-17441 | Critical (9.1) | 7.0% | — | Dec 11, 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 headers does not validate whether the IPv6 payload length field is equal to the actual size of the payload, which leads to an Out-of-Bounds read… |
| CVE-2017-1000210 | Critical (9.8) | 2.2% | — | Nov 17, 2017 | picoTCP (versions 1.7.0 - 1.5.0) is vulnerable to stack buffer overflow resulting in code execution or denial of service attack |