Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas2684▼ 86 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1444▲ 301 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)64▼ 462 respecto a la semana anterior
–

9 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
ModificadaAlta (7.5)1.4%—Agendaless Waitress29/10/202417/6/2026
Waitress is a Web Server Gateway Interface server for Python 2 and 3. When a remote client closes the connection before waitress has had the opportunity to call getpeername() waitress won't correctly clean up the connection leading to the main thread attempting to write to a socket that no longer exists, but not…
AnalizadaMedia (4.8)0.49%—Agendaless Waitress29/10/202417/6/2026
Waitress is a Web Server Gateway Interface server for Python 2 and 3. A remote client may send a request that is exactly recv_bytes (defaults to 8192) long, followed by a secondary request using HTTP pipelining. When request lookahead is disabled (default) we won't read any more requests, and when the first request…
ModificadaMedia (5.9)1.5%—Agendaless Waitress31/5/202217/6/2026
Waitress is a Web Server Gateway Interface server for Python 2 and 3. Waitress versions 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 may terminate early due to a thread closing a socket while the main thread is about to call select(). This will lead to the main thread raising an exception that is not handled and then causing the entire…
ModificadaAlta (7.5)1.8%—Agendaless WaitressDebian Linux17/3/202217/6/2026
Waitress is a Web Server Gateway Interface server for Python 2 and 3. When using Waitress versions 2.1.0 and prior behind a proxy that does not properly validate the incoming HTTP request matches the RFC7230 standard, Waitress and the frontend proxy may disagree on where one request starts and where it ends. This…
ModificadaMedia (6.5)2.4%—Agendaless Waitress4/2/202017/6/2026
Waitress version 1.4.2 allows a DOS attack When waitress receives a header that contains invalid characters. When a header like "Bad-header: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\x10" is received, it will cause the regular expression engine to catastrophically backtrack causing the process to use 100% CPU time and blocking any other…
ModificadaAlta (7.5)2.0%—Agendaless WaitressOracle Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native EnvironmentDebian Linux22/1/202017/6/2026
Waitress through version 1.3.1 allows request smuggling by sending the Content-Length header twice. Waitress would header fold a double Content-Length header and due to being unable to cast the now comma separated value to an integer would set the Content-Length to 0 internally. If two Content-Length headers are sent…
ModificadaAlta (8.2)2.6%—Agendaless WaitressOracle Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native EnvironmentDebian LinuxFedoraproject Fedora+126/12/201917/6/2026
In Waitress through version 1.4.0, if a proxy server is used in front of waitress, an invalid request may be sent by an attacker that bypasses the front-end and is parsed differently by waitress leading to a potential for HTTP request smuggling. Specially crafted requests containing special whitespace characters in…
ModificadaAlta (7.5)2.4%—Agendaless WaitressOracle Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native EnvironmentDebian LinuxFedoraproject Fedora+120/12/201917/6/2026
Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding…
ModificadaAlta (7.5)2.5%—Agendaless WaitressOracle Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native EnvironmentDebian LinuxFedoraproject Fedora+120/12/201917/6/2026
Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 which states: "Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR." Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse…