Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas3340▲ 436 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1491▲ 179 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)592▲ 119 respecto a la semana anterior
–

5 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
Pendiente de análisisMedia (5.3)0.13%—Mongodb Python DriverAI24/9/202624/9/2026
The client-side field level encryption support in the MongoDB Python Driver can treat a key management endpoint value ending in ".sock" as a local Unix domain socket path rather than a remote host. A user with write access to the encryption key metadata stored in the database can cause an application using the driver…
AnalizadaMedia (6.1)0.48%—Mongodb Python Driver10/9/202629/9/2026
Improper neutralization of special elements in data query logic in the GridFS component of the MongoDB Python Driver can cause a caller-supplied structured file identifier to be interpreted as a query condition rather than as a literal identifier. An authenticated user who can influence the identifier passed by an…
Pendiente de análisisMedia (6.5)0.12%—Snowflake Python DriverAISnowflake GO DriverAISnowflake Jdbc DriverAISnowflake Node.js DriverAI+28/9/202610/9/2026
Insertion of sensitive information into log files in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, Node.js, PHP PDO, and ODBC drivers allowed authentication tokens, query-result encryption keys, pre-signed cloud-storage URLs, and SAML assertions to be written to diagnostic logs in circumstances where the available log redaction did…
Pendiente de análisisAlta (7.4)0.16%—Snowflake Python DriverAISnowflake GO DriverAISnowflake Jdbc DriverAISnowflake Node.js DriverAI4/9/202610/9/2026
Improper OCSP response validation in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, and Node.js drivers allowed a revoked TLS certificate to be accepted as valid, because OCSP responses were not reliably bound to the certificate being validated and definitive verification failures were treated as transient. A man-in-the-middle…
Pendiente de análisisCrítica (9.3)0.80%—Amazon Redshift-python-driverAI18/5/202623/7/2026
Unsafe use of Python's eval() on server-received data in the vector_in() function in amazon-redshift-python-driver before 2.1.14 allows a rogue server or man-in-the-middle actor to execute arbitrary code on the client. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 2.1.14.