Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas2847▼ 151 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1373▲ 54 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)5▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)267▼ 257 respecto a la semana anterior
–

5 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
AplazadaCrítica (9.4)0.49%—PaperclipAI21/8/202624/9/2026
Paperclip before 0.3.1 in default local_trusted mode fails to validate Host headers, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via DNS rebinding. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by a developer running Paperclip locally, uses DNS rebinding to make authenticated API requests and…
AnalizadaCrítica (10)7.4%—PaperclipaiPaperclipai/server23/4/202617/6/2026
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Prior to version 2026.416.0, an unauthenticated attacker can achieve full remote code execution on any network-accessible Paperclip instance running in `authenticated` mode with default configuration. No user…
AnalizadaAlta (8.8)0.83%—Paperclipai23/4/202617/6/2026
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Versions of @paperclipai/server prior to 2026.416.0 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows an attacker with an Agent API key to execute arbitrary OS commands on the Paperclip server host. An attacker…
ModificadaCrítica (9.8)3.1%—Thoughtbot Paperclip13/11/201717/6/2026
Paperclip ruby gem version 3.1.4 and later suffers from a Server-SIde Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Paperclip::UriAdapter class. Attackers may be able to access information about internal network resources.
ModificadaMedia (4.3)2.1%—Thoughtbot Paperclip10/7/201517/6/2026
The thoughtbot paperclip gem before 4.2.2 for Ruby does not consider the content-type value during media-type validation, which allows remote attackers to upload HTML documents and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a spoofed value, as demonstrated by image/jpeg.