Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2556▼ 319 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1344▲ 80 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)5▼ 7 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)62▼ 466 respecto a la semana anterior
3 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Crítica (9.1) | 2.8% | — | Openfortivpn Project OpenfortivpnFedoraproject FedoraOpensuse Backports SLEOpensuse Leap | 27/2/2020 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL before 1.0.2. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because hostname comparisons do not consider '\0' characters, as demonstrated by a good.example.com\x00evil.example.com attack. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.3) | 1.6% | — | Openfortivpn Project OpenfortivpnFedoraproject FedoraOpensuse Backports SLEOpensuse Leap | 27/2/2020 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because the hostname check operates on uninitialized memory. The outcome is that a valid certificate is never accepted (only a malformed certificate may be accepted). | |
| Modificada | Media (5.3) | 1.7% | — | Openfortivpn Project OpenfortivpnFedoraproject FedoraOpensuse Backports SLEOpensuse Leap | 27/2/2020 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in openfortivpn 1.11.0 when used with OpenSSL 1.0.2 or later. tunnel.c mishandles certificate validation because an X509_check_host negative error code is interpreted as a successful return value. |