Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas3335▲ 417 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1494▲ 172 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)579▲ 105 respecto a la semana anterior
70 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pendiente de análisis | Alta (7.1) | — | — | Octopus ServerAI | 1/10/2026 | 1/10/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server, users with certain scoped permission sets could execute arbitrary scripts in an environment without possessing the required authorization. | |
| Pendiente de análisis | Alta (8.7) | 0.33% | — | Octopus ServerAI | 29/9/2026 | 29/9/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permissions to edit an Environment or Project can set specifically crafted JSON content for the object. Insecure deserialization of this content allows the user to execute arbitrary code in the Octopus Server process. | |
| Pendiente de análisis | Alta (8.7) | 0.69% | — | Octopus ServerAI | 16/9/2026 | 16/9/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to modify non built-in external feeds could exploit a path traversal flaw to overwrite arbitrary files on the server, which in some configurations could lead to remote code execution. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.1) | 0.23% | — | Octopus Server | 20/8/2026 | 2/9/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the deployment variable snapshot in clear-text. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.1) | 0.33% | — | Octopus Server | 24/7/2026 | 17/8/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy Insufficient checks on the project trigger actions allows an unauthorized user to trigger a deployment. | |
| Aplazada | Media (5.6) | 0.32% | — | Octopus ServerAI | 19/6/2026 | 22/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server with certain access levels it was possible to embed a Cross-Site Scripting Payload via artifacts. | |
| Analizada | Media (6) | 0.37% | — | Octopus Server | 4/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make server level changes using a certain API endpoint despite receiving an error. | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.3) | 0.25% | — | Octopus Server | 17/3/2026 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a low privileged user to manipulate an API request to change the signing key expiration and revocation time frames via an API endpoint that had incorrect permission validation. It was not possible to expose the signing keys using this vulnerability. | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.3) | 0.25% | — | Octopus Server | 5/3/2026 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible to create a new API key from an existing access token resulting in the new API key having a lifetime exceeding the original API key used to mint the access token. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.9) | 0.34% | — | Octopus Server | 25/2/2026 | 17/6/2026 | In affected version of Octopus Deploy it was possible to remove files and/or contents of files on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to circumvent expected workflows. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.9) | 0.36% | — | Octopus Server | 10/4/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In affected Microsoft Windows versions of Octopus Deploy, the server can be coerced into sending server-side requests that contain authentication material allowing a suitably positioned attacker to compromise the account running Octopus Server and potentially the host infrastructure itself. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.9) | 0.42% | — | Octopus Server | 11/2/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a user with sufficient access to set custom headers in all server responses. By submitting a specifically crafted referrer header the user could ensure that all subsequent server responses would return 500 errors rendering the site mostly unusable. The user… | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.3) | 0.35% | — | Octopus Server | 11/2/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it was possible to upload files to unexpected locations on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to circumvent expected workflows. | |
| Analizada | Baja (1.8) | 0.24% | — | Octopus Server | 11/2/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server error messages were handled unsafely on the error page. If an adversary could control any part of the error message they could embed code which may impact the user viewing the error message. | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.3) | 0.38% | — | Octopus Server | 11/2/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server the preview import feature could be leveraged to identify the existence of a target file. This could provide an adversary with information that may aid in further attacks against the server. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.9) | 0.37% | — | Octopus Server | 11/2/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy where customers are using Active Directory for authentication it was possible for an unauthenticated user to make an API request against two endpoints which would retrieve some data from the associated Active Directory. The requests when crafted correctly would return specific… | |
| Analizada | Alta (8.7) | 0.43% | — | Octopus Server | 30/9/2024 | 17/6/2026 | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Linux and Microsoft Windows Octopus Server on Windows, Linux allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Octopus Server: from 2024.1.0 before 2024.1.13038, from 2024.2.0 before 2024.2.9482, from 2024.3.0 before… | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.6) | 0.25% | — | Octopus Server | 11/9/2024 | 17/6/2026 | Affected versions of Octopus Server had a weak content security policy. | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.6) | 0.25% | — | Octopus Server | 21/8/2024 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server OIDC cookies were using the wrong expiration time which could result in them using the maximum lifespan. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.5) | 0.23% | — | Octopus Server | 25/7/2024 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the task log in clear-text. | |
| Analizada | Baja (2.2) | 0.24% | — | Octopus Server | 25/7/2024 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain conditions, a user with specific role assignments can access restricted project artifacts. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.4) | 0.26% | — | Octopus Server | 8/5/2024 | 17/6/2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server with certain access levels it was possible to embed a Cross-Site Scripting payload on the audit page. | |
| Analizada | Baja (3.5) | 0.30% | — | Octopus Server | 30/4/2024 | 17/6/2026 | It was identified that in certain versions of Octopus Server, that a user created with no permissions could view all users, user roles and permissions. This functionality was removed in versions of Octopus Server after the fixed versions listed. | |
| Analizada | Media (4.3) | 0.23% | — | Octopus Server | 18/4/2024 | 17/6/2026 | It is possible for an API key to be logged in clear text in the audit log file after an invalid login attempt. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.5) | 0.39% | — | Octopus Server | 9/4/2024 | 17/6/2026 | A race condition was identified through which privilege escalation was possible in certain configurations. |