Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2624▼ 224 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1373▲ 143 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)81▼ 449 respecto a la semana anterior
4 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pendiente de análisis | Media (6.9) | 0.38% | — | Wevm MppxAI | 22/9/2026 | 24/9/2026 | mppx is a TypeScript interface for machine payments protocol. Prior to 0.8.2, the fee-payer cosigning path in src/tempo/internal/fee-payer.ts copied a client-supplied access_list from a 0x78 FeePayerEnvelope without validating its length or contents. Because EIP-2930 access-list entries consume intrinsic gas even when… | |
| Pendiente de análisis | Media (6.9) | 0.38% | — | Wevm MppxAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | mppx is a TypeScript interface for machine payments protocol. Prior to 0.8.2, FeePayerPolicy in src/tempo/internal/fee-payer.ts used decodeFunctionData to validate fee-sponsored calldata but did not reject trailing bytes. A client could append nonzero padding that increased intrinsic calldata gas while gas_limit and… | |
| Analizada | Media (6) | 0.57% | — | Wevm Mppx | 31/3/2026 | 24/7/2026 | mppx is a TypeScript interface for machine payments protocol. Prior to version 0.4.11, the stripe/charge payment method did not check Stripe's Idempotent-Replayed response header when creating PaymentIntents. An attacker could replay a valid credential containing the same spt token against a new challenge, and the… | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.5) | 0.44% | — | Wevm Mppx | 31/3/2026 | 24/7/2026 | mppx is a TypeScript interface for machine payments protocol. Prior to version 0.4.11, the tempo/session cooperative close handler validated the close voucher amount using "<" instead of "<=" against the on-chain settled amount. An attacker could submit a close voucher exactly equal to the settled amount, which would… |