Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2663▼ 380 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1289▼ 36 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)5▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)244▼ 274 respecto a la semana anterior
70 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analizada | Alta (8.8) | 0.54% | — | Lunary | 2/2/2026 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.2.2, an account hijacking vulnerability exists due to a password reset token leak. A user with a 'viewer' role can exploit this vulnerability to hijack another user's account by obtaining the password reset token. The vulnerability is triggered when the 'viewer' role user sends a specific… | |
| Analizada | Media (6.5) | 0.44% | — | Lunary | 2/2/2026 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.2.13, an insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability allows users to delete prompts created in other organizations through ID manipulation. The vulnerability stems from the application's failure to validate the ownership of the prompt before deletion, only checking if the… | |
| Analizada | Alta (8.8) | 0.47% | — | Lunary | 25/11/2025 | 17/6/2026 | lunary-ai/lunary version 1.9.34 is vulnerable to an account takeover due to improper authentication in the Google OAuth integration. The application fails to verify the 'aud' (audience) field in the access token issued by Google, which is crucial for ensuring the token is intended for the application. This oversight… | |
| Analizada | Crítica (9.6) | 0.50% | — | Lunary | 23/8/2025 | 17/6/2026 | A critical stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Analytics component of lunary-ai/lunary versions up to 1.9.23, where the NEXT_PUBLIC_CUSTOM_SCRIPT environment variable is directly injected into the DOM using dangerouslySetInnerHTML without any sanitization or validation. This allows arbitrary… | |
| Aplazada | Alta (7.7) | 0.24% | — | LunaryAI | 18/8/2025 | 17/6/2026 | An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability was identified in the `POST /v1/templates` endpoint of the Lunary API, affecting versions up to 0.8.8. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to create templates in another user's project by altering the `projectId` query parameter. The root cause of this… | |
| Analizada | Media (6.1) | 0.45% | — | Lunary | 7/7/2025 | 17/6/2026 | lunary-ai/lunary versions prior to 1.9.24 are vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). An unauthenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into the `v1/runs/ingest` endpoint by adding an empty `citations` field, triggering a code path where `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` is used to render… | |
| Analizada | Media (5.4) | 0.38% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in lunary-ai/lunary versions 1.6.7 and earlier. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into the SAML IdP XML metadata, which is used to generate the SAML login redirect URL. This URL is then set as the value of `window.location.href` without proper… | |
| Analizada | Alta (8.1) | 0.58% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary version v1.4.29, the GET /projects API endpoint exposes both public and private API keys for all projects to users with minimal permissions, such as Viewers or Prompt Editors. This vulnerability allows unauthorized users to retrieve sensitive credentials, which can be used to perform actions on… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.1) | 0.56% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.4.30, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists where admins can invite new members with billing permissions, thereby gaining unauthorized access to billing resources. This issue arises because the user creation endpoint does not restrict admins from inviting users with billing… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.1) | 0.51% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.4.28, the /checklists/:id route allows low-privilege users to modify checklists by sending a PATCH request. The route lacks proper access control, such as middleware to ensure that only authorized users (e.g., project owners or admins) can modify checklist data. This vulnerability allows… | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 0.72% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary version v1.4.28, the /bigquery API route lacks proper access control, allowing any logged-in user to create a Datastream to Google BigQuery and export the entire database. This includes sensitive data such as password hashes and secret API keys. The route is protected by a config check… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.54% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.4.26, the checklists.post() endpoint allows users to create or modify checklists without validating whether the user has proper permissions. This missing access control permits unauthorized users to create checklists, bypassing intended permission checks. Additionally, the endpoint… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.79% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | lunary-ai/lunary version v1.4.25 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/data-warehouse/bigquery endpoint. This vulnerability allows any user to export the entire database data by creating a stream to Google BigQuery without proper authentication or authorization. The issue is fixed in… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.80% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in lunary-ai/lunary version git f07a845. The server uses the regex /{.*?}/ to match user-controlled strings. In the default JavaScript regex engine, this regex can take polynomial time to match certain crafted user inputs. As a result, an attacker can… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.81% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | Lunary-ai/lunary version git 105a3f6 is vulnerable to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack. The application allows users to upload their own regular expressions, which are then executed on the server side. Certain regular expressions can have exponential runtime complexity relative to the input size,… | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.3) | 0.83% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary, the privilege check mechanism is flawed in version git afc5df4. The system incorrectly identifies certain endpoints as public if the path contains '/auth/' anywhere within it. This allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive endpoints by including '/auth/' in the path. As a result,… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.81% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | A vulnerability in lunary-ai/lunary, as of commit be54057, allows users to upload and execute arbitrary regular expressions on the server side. This can lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition, as certain regular expressions can cause excessive resource consumption, blocking the server from processing other… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.81% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in the lunary-ai/lunary repository, specifically in the compileTextTemplate function. The affected version is git be54057. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the regular expression /{{(.*?)}}/g, causing the server to hang… | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 1.5% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | A broken access control vulnerability exists in lunary-ai/lunary versions 1.2.7 through 1.4.2. The vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to modify any user's templates by sending a crafted HTTP POST request to the /v1/templates/{id}/versions endpoint. This issue is resolved in version 1.4.3. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.5) | 0.58% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.6.3, the application allows the creation of evaluators without enforcing a unique constraint on the combination of projectId and slug. This allows an attacker to overwrite existing data by submitting a POST request with the same slug as an existing evaluator. The lack of database… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.71% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.6.3, an improper access control vulnerability exists where a user can access prompt data of another user. This issue affects version 1.6.2 and the main branch. The vulnerability allows unauthorized users to view sensitive prompt data by accessing specific URLs, leading to potential… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.56% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability exists in the `PATCH /v1/runs/:id/score` endpoint of lunary-ai/lunary version 1.6.0. This vulnerability allows an attacker to update the score data of any run by manipulating the id parameter in the request URL, which corresponds to the `runId_score` in the… | |
| Analizada | Alta (8.1) | 0.54% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.5.9, the /v1/evaluators/ endpoint allows users to delete evaluators of a project by sending a DELETE request. However, the route lacks proper access control, such as middleware to ensure that only users with appropriate roles can delete evaluator data. This vulnerability allows… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.52% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.5.6, the `/v1/evaluators/` endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any user associated with a project to fetch all evaluator data regardless of their role. This vulnerability permits low-privilege users to access potentially sensitive evaluation data. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.3) | 0.50% | — | Lunary | 20/3/2025 | 17/6/2026 | In version 1.5.5 of lunary-ai/lunary, a vulnerability exists where admins, who do not have direct permissions to access billing resources, can change the permissions of existing users to include billing permissions. This can lead to a privilege escalation scenario where an administrator can manage billing, effectively… |