Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2635▼ 213 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1376▲ 145 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)81▼ 449 respecto a la semana anterior
7 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aplazada | Crítica (9.3) | 0.19% | — | LuantiAILuajitAI | 16/4/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Luanti 5 before 5.15.2, when LuaJIT is used, allows a Lua sandbox escape via a crafted mod. | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.1) | 0.62% | — | Luajit | 7/7/2025 | 17/6/2026 | LuaJIT through 2.1 and OpenRusty luajit2 before v2.1-20240314 have an out-of-bounds read in the stack-overflow handler in lj_state.c. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.53% | — | Luajit | 7/7/2025 | 17/6/2026 | LuaJIT through 2.1 and OpenRusty luajit2 before v2.1-20240314 have an unsinking of IR_FSTORE for NULL metatable, which leads to Denial of Service (DoS). | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 0.56% | — | Luajit | 7/7/2025 | 17/6/2026 | LuaJIT through 2.1 and OpenRusty luajit2 before v2.1-20240626 have a stack-buffer-overflow in lj_strfmt_wfnum in lj_strfmt_num.c. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.5% | — | Luajit | 17/8/2020 | 17/6/2026 | LuaJIT through 2.1.0-beta3 has an out-of-bounds read in lj_err_run in lj_err.c. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 3.1% | — | LuajitDebian LinuxCanonical Ubuntu Linux | 21/7/2020 | 17/6/2026 | LuaJit through 2.1.0-beta3 has an out-of-bounds read because __gc handler frame traversal is mishandled. | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.1) | 1.4% | — | LuajitMoonjit Project Moonjit | 29/11/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In LuaJIT through 2.0.5, as used in Moonjit before 2.1.2 and other products, debug.getinfo has a type confusion issue that leads to arbitrary memory write or read operations, because certain cases involving valid stack levels and > options are mishandled. NOTE: The LuaJIT project owner states that the debug libary is… |