Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas2757▲ 47 respecto a la semana anterior

Críticas / altas1482▲ 372 respecto a la semana anterior

Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior

Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)64▼ 462 respecto a la semana anterior

11 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVE	Estado	Severidad	EPSS	Explotación activa	Tecnologías afectadas	Publicada ▼	Modificada	Descripción
CVE-2025-57247	Aplazada	Crítica (9.1)	0.36%	—	Ethereum Erc20^AI	6/10/2025	17/6/2026	The BATBToken smart contract (address 0xfbf1388408670c02f0dbbb74251d8ded1d63b7a2, Compiler Version v0.8.26+commit.8a97fa7a) contains incorrect access control implementation in whitelist management functions. The setColdWhiteList() and setSpecialAddress() functions in the base ERC20 contract are declared as public…
CVE-2020-19766	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	0.95%	—	Tokenerc20 Project Tokenerc20	7/9/2021	17/6/2026	The time check operation of PepeAuctionSale 1.0 can be rendered ineffective by assigning a large number to the _duration variable, compromising access control to the application.
CVE-2018-11561	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	0.92%	—	Erc20token Project Erc20token	8/8/2018	17/6/2026	An integer overflow in the unprotected distributeToken function of a smart contract implementation for EETHER (EETHER), an Ethereum ERC20 token, will lead to an unauthorized increase of an attacker's digital assets.
CVE-2018-13673	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	1.1%	—	Goldtokenerc20 Project Goldtokenerc20	9/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GoldTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13643	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	1.1%	—	Gcrtokenerc20 Project Gcrtokenerc20	9/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GCRTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13639	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	1.1%	—	VEU Tokenerc20 Project VEU Tokenerc20	9/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Virtual Energy Units (VEU) (Contract Name: VEU_TokenERC20), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13556	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	1.0%	—	Cosmotokenerc20 Project Cosmotokenerc20	9/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for COSMOTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13550	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	0.99%	—	Coquinhoerc20 Project Coquinhoerc20	9/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Coquinho Coin (CQNC) (Contract Name: CoquinhoERC20), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13536	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	1.1%	—	Erc20 ICO Project Erc20 ICO	9/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ERC20_ICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13088	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	0.92%	—	Tokenerc20 Project Tokenerc20	3/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Futures Pease (FP), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.
CVE-2018-13082	Modificada	Alta (7.5)	0.92%	—	Moditokenerc20 Project Moditokenerc20	3/7/2018	17/6/2026	The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MODI Token (MODI), an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value.