Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas3006▼ 69 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1420▲ 54 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)382▼ 128 respecto a la semana anterior
4 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Alta (8.2) | 0.60% | — | Eclipse Californium | 10/11/2022 | 17/6/2026 | Eclipse Californium is a Java implementation of RFC7252 - Constrained Application Protocol for IoT Cloud services. In versions prior to 3.7.0, and 2.7.4, Californium is vulnerable to a Denial of Service. Failing handshakes don't cleanup counters for throttling, causing the threshold to be reached without being… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.59% | — | Eclipse Californium | 29/7/2022 | 17/6/2026 | In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification (DDoS other peers) and high CPU load… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.34% | — | Eclipse Californium | 20/8/2021 | 17/6/2026 | In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.85% | — | Eclipse Californium | 3/2/2021 | 17/6/2026 | In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server… |