Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2748▲ 38 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1479▲ 369 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)7▼ 3 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)64▼ 462 respecto a la semana anterior
8 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Media (5.5) | 0.30% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 6/6/2023 | 17/6/2026 | axTLS v2.1.5 was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow in the bi_import function in axtls-code/crypto/bigint.c. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) when parsing a private key. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.5% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 3/12/2019 | 17/6/2026 | process_certificate in tls1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS through 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow via a crafted TLS certificate handshake message with zero certificates. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.9% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 3/12/2019 | 17/6/2026 | The asn1_signature function in asn1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS through 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow that allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted certificate in the TLS certificate handshake message, because the result of get_asn1_length() is not checked for… | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 2.7% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 26/3/2019 | 17/6/2026 | tls1.c in Cameron Hamilton-Rich axTLS before 2.1.5 has a Buffer Overflow via a crafted sequence of TLS packets because the need_bytes value is mismanaged. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.9) | 0.62% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 7/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is an… | |
| Modificada | Media (5.9) | 0.59% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 7/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This… | |
| Modificada | Media (5.9) | 0.70% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 7/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification blindly trusts the declared lengths in the ASN.1 structure. Consequently, when small public exponents are being used, a remote attacker can generate purposefully crafted signatures (and put them on X.509 certificates)… | |
| Modificada | Media (5.3) | 0.87% | — | Axtls Project Axtls | 22/1/2018 | 17/6/2026 | axTLS version 1.5.3 has a coding error in the ASN.1 parser resulting in the year (19)50 of UTCTime being misinterpreted as 2050. |