Vulnerabilidades

Weak Security in the PF-50 1.2 keyfob of PGST PG107 Alarm System 1.25.05.hf allows attackers to compromise access control via a code replay attack.

The remote keyless system of the Hozard alarm system (alarmsystemen) v1.0 sends an identical radio frequency signal for each request, which results in an attacker being able to conduct replay attacks to bring the alarm system to a disarmed state.

Hozard alarm system (Alarmsysteem) v1.0 is vulnerable to Improper Authentication. Commands sent via the SMS functionality are accepted from random phone numbers, which allows an attacker to bring the alarm system to a disarmed state from any given phone number.

Missing encryption in the RFID tags of the Hozard alarm system (Alarmsysteem) v1.0 allow attackers to create a cloned tag via brief physical proximity to one of the original tags, which results in an attacker being able to bring the alarm system to a disarmed state.

A default engineer password set on the Hozard alarm system (Alarmsysteem) v1.0 allows an attacker to bring the alarm system to a disarmed state.

The number of attempts to bring the Hozard Alarm system (alarmsystemen) v1.0 to a disarmed state is not limited. This could allow an attacker to perform a brute force on the SMS authentication, to bring the alarm system to a disarmed state.

The absence of notifications regarding an ongoing RF jamming attack in the SecuritasHome home alarm system, version HPGW-G 0.0.2.23F BG_U-ITR-F1-BD_BL.A30.20181117, allows an attacker to block legitimate traffic while not alerting the owner of the system.

An RF replay attack vulnerability in the SecuritasHome home alarm system, version HPGW-G 0.0.2.23F BG_U-ITR-F1-BD_BL.A30.20181117, allows an attacker to trigger arbitrary system functionality by replaying previously recorded signals. This lets an adversary, among other things, disarm an armed system.

The ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 (v3.01.17) fails to properly authenticate some requests to its built-in HTTPS interface. Someone can use this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information from the system, such as usernames and passwords. This information can then be used to reconfigure or disable the…

An issue was discovered on ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 3.01.01 devices. Due to an insufficient implementation of jamming detection, an attacker is able to suppress correctly received RF messages sent between wireless peripheral components, e.g., wireless detectors or remote controls, and the ABUS Secvest alarm central. An…

Due to the use of an insecure RFID technology (MIFARE Classic), ABUS proximity chip keys (RFID tokens) of the ABUS Secvest FUAA50000 wireless alarm system can easily be cloned and used to deactivate the alarm system in an unauthorized way.

Due to unencrypted signal communication and predictability of rolling codes, an attacker can "desynchronize" an ABUS Secvest wireless remote control (FUBE50014 or FUBE50015) relative to its controlled Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 3.01.01, so that sent commands by the remote control are not accepted anymore.

Due to the use of an insecure algorithm for rolling codes in the ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 3.01.01 and its remote controls FUBE50014 and FUBE50015, an attacker is able to predict valid future rolling codes, and can thus remotely control the alarm system in an unauthorized way.

An issue was discovered on ABUS Secvest wireless alarm system FUAA50000 3.01.01 in conjunction with Secvest remote control FUBE50014 or FUBE50015. Because "encrypted signal transmission" is missing, an attacker is able to eavesdrop sensitive data as cleartext (for instance, the current rolling code state).

The Chuango 433 MHz burglar-alarm product line uses static codes in the RF remote control, allowing an attacker to arm, disarm, or trigger the alarm remotely via replay attacks, as demonstrated by Chuango branded products, and non-Chuango branded products such as the Eminent EM8617 OV2 Wifi Alarm System.