Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas2768▼ 449 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1325▼ 128 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)268▼ 240 respecto a la semana anterior
–

199 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
ModificadaMedia (6.1)0.73%—IBM Security Guardium3/6/202017/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 174738.
ModificadaAlta (8.8)3.0%—IBM Security Guardium3/6/202017/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 174735.
ModificadaCrítica (9.8)1.0%—IBM Security Guardium3/6/202017/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 11.1 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 174732.
ModificadaAlta (7.5)0.98%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 161418.
ModificadaMedia (4.3)1.1%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 does not set the secure attribute for cookies in HTTPS sessions, which could cause the user agent to send those cookies in plaintext over an HTTP session. IBM X-Force ID: 161210.
ModificadaMedia (4.3)0.90%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 uses incomplete blacklisting for input validation which allows attackers to bypass application controls resulting in direct impact to the system and data integrity. IBM X-Force ID: 161209.
ModificadaAlta (7.5)0.98%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 stores sensitive information in cleartext within a resource that might be accessible to another control sphere. IBM X-Force ID: 1610141.
ModificadaMedia (5.3)1.2%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 discloses sensitive information to unauthorized users. The information can be used to mount further attacks on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 161037.
ModificadaMedia (5.5)0.28%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 uses hard coded credentials which could allow a local user to obtain highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 161035.
ModificadaMedia (5.5)0.28%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 160987.
ModificadaMedia (6.5)1.0%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence29/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence (SonarG) 4.0 specifies permissions for a security-critical resource which could lead to the exposure of sensitive information or the modification of that resource by unintended parties. IBM X-Force ID: 160986.
ModificadaAlta (8.8)1.7%—IBM Security Guardium3/10/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.5, and 10.6 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation which could allow an authenticated user to change the accessmgr password. IBM X-Force ID: 162768.
ModificadaAlta (8.2)2.4%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence20/8/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence 4.0 (SonarG) is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 161419.
ModificadaAlta (7.5)1.7%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence20/8/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence 4.0 (SonarG) does not properly restrict the size or amount of resources that are requested or influenced by an actor. This weakness can be used to consume more resources than intended. IBM X-Force ID: 161417.
ModificadaAlta (7.5)2.2%—IBM Security Guardium BIG Data Intelligence20/8/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium Big Data Intelligence 4.0 (SonarG) uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 161036.
ModificadaAlta (8.8)3.7%—IBM Security Guardium2/7/201917/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10.5 could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable web server. IBM X-Force ID: 160698.
ModificadaMedia (5.4)0.97%—IBM Security Guardium17/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152082.
ModificadaMedia (5.4)0.97%—IBM Security Guardium17/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152080.
ModificadaAlta (7.5)2.0%—IBM Security Guardium17/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610.
ModificadaMedia (5.3)1.7%—IBM Security Guardium17/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747.
ModificadaMedia (5.9)0.78%—IBM Security Guardium17/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740.
ModificadaCrítica (9.8)0.84%—IBM Security Guardium13/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 150022.
ModificadaMedia (6.1)0.89%—IBM Security Guardium13/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 150021.
ModificadaAlta (7.5)1.3%—IBM Security Guardium13/12/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 uses a one-way cryptographic hash against an input that should not be reversible, such as a password, but the software does not also use a salt as part of the input. IBM X-Force ID: 124743.
ModificadaAlta (7.4)0.87%—IBM Security Guardium2/10/201817/6/2026
IBM Security Guardium EcoSystem 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be…
Orbitaley — Vulnerabilidades