Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2970▼ 106 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1447▲ 86 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)350▼ 160 respecto a la semana anterior
155 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.3% | — | Octopus Deploy | 22/10/2020 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy through 2020.4.4. If enabled, the websocket endpoint may allow an untrusted tentacle host to present itself as a trusted one. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.5% | — | Octopus Deploy | 12/10/2020 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.1.0 to 2020.4.0, certain scripts can reveal sensitive information to the user in the task logs. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.8% | — | Octopus Deploy | 9/9/2020 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2020.3.x before 2020.3.4 and 2020.4.x before 2020.4.1, if an authenticated user creates a deployment or runbook process using Azure steps and sets the step's execution location to run on the server/worker, then (under certain circumstances) the account password is exposed in cleartext in the verbose… | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 0.55% | — | Octopus ServerOctopus Server | 25/8/2020 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy 3.4. A deployment target can be configured with an Account or Certificate that is outside the scope of the deployment target. An authorised user can potentially use a certificate that they are not in scope to use. An authorised user is also able to obtain certificate metadata… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.85% | — | Octopus Deploy | 19/6/2020 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2019.x before 2019.12.2, an authenticated user with could trigger a deployment that leaks the Helm Chart repository password. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 0.98% | — | Octopus Deploy | 28/4/2020 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy before 2019.12.9 and 2020 before 2020.1.12, the TaskView permission is not scoped to any dimension. For example, a scoped user who is scoped to only one tenant can view server tasks scoped to any other tenant. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.0% | — | Octopus Deploy | 19/3/2020 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy before 2020.1.5, for customers running on-premises Active Directory linked to their Octopus server, an authenticated user can leverage a bug to escalate privileges. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.99% | — | Octopus Deploy | 28/11/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.6, an authenticated user with TeamEdit permission could send a malformed Team API request that bypasses input validation and causes an application level denial of service condition. (The fix for this was also backported to LTS 2019.9.8 and LTS 2019.6.14.) | |
| Modificada | Media (5.3) | 0.42% | — | Octopus Deploy | 28/11/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.7, in a configuration where SSL offloading is enabled, the CSRF cookie was sometimes sent without the secure attribute. (The fix for this was backported to LTS versions 2019.6.14 and 2019.9.8.) | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.61% | — | Octopus Server | 18/11/2019 | 17/6/2026 | A persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Octopus Server 3.4.0 through 2019.10.5 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 0.69% | — | Octopus Deploy | 18/11/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.3.0 through 2019.10.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted package, triggering an exception that exposes underlying operating system details. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 0.88% | — | Octopus Server | 27/8/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2019.7.3 through 2019.7.9, in certain circumstances, an authenticated user with VariableView permissions could view sensitive values. This is fixed in 2019.7.10. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.66% | — | Octopus ServerOctopus Tentacle | 23/8/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Tentacle versions 3.0.8 to 5.0.0, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited OctopusPrintVariables circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 5.0.1. The fix was back-ported… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.63% | — | Octopus Server | 23/8/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy versions 2018.8.4 to 2019.7.6, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited special-characters circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.7. The fix was… | |
| Modificada | Media (4.9) | 1.5% | — | Octopus DeployOctopus Server | 5/8/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2019.4.0 through 2019.6.x before 2019.6.6, and 2019.7.x before 2019.7.6, an authenticated system administrator is able to view sensitive values by visiting a server configuration page or making an API call. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 1.1% | — | Octopus Deploy | 25/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy versions 3.0.19 to 2019.7.2, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.3. The fix was back-ported to LTS 2019.6.5 as… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.1) | 1.2% | — | Octopus DeployOctopus Server | 1/5/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2019.1.0 through 2019.3.1 and 2019.4.0 through 2019.4.5, an authenticated user with the VariableViewUnscoped or VariableEditUnscoped permission scoped to a specific project could view or edit unscoped variables from a different project. (These permissions are only used in custom User Roles and do not… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.3% | — | Jenkins Octopusdeploy | 4/4/2019 | 17/6/2026 | Jenkins OctopusDeploy Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 1.0% | — | Jenkins Octopusdeploy | 20/2/2019 | 17/6/2026 | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins OctopusDeploy Plugin 1.8.1 and earlier in OctopusDeployPlugin.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified URL and obtain the HTTP response code if successful, and exception error message otherwise. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 1.5% | — | Octopus DeployOctopus Server | 20/2/2019 | 17/6/2026 | An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 12% | 💥 Exploit | Octopus Server | 31/10/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2018.9.x before 2018.9.1, an authenticated user with permission to modify deployment processes could upload a maliciously crafted YAML configuration, potentially allowing for remote execution of arbitrary code, running in the same context as the Octopus Server (for self-hosted… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.79% | — | Octopus Deploy | 26/6/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.0 onwards (before 2018.6.7), an authenticated user with incorrect permissions may be able to create Accounts under the Infrastructure menu. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.93% | — | Octopus Server | 11/6/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy version 2018.5.1 to 2018.5.7, a user with Task View is able to view a password for a Service Fabric Cluster, when the Service Fabric Cluster target is configured in Azure Active Directory security mode and a deployment is executed with OctopusPrintVariables set to True. This is fixed in 2018.6.0. | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 1.4% | — | Octopus Server | 21/5/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.4.4 through 2018.5.1, Octopus variables that are sourced from the target do not have sensitive values obfuscated in the deployment logs. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.73% | — | Octopus Deploy | 1/5/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.4.x before 2018.4.7, an authenticated user is able to view/update/save variable values within the Tenant Variables area for Environments that do not exist within their associated Team scoping. This occurs in situations where this authenticated user also belongs to multiple teams, where one of the… |