Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2720▼ 598 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1299▼ 202 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)299▼ 211 respecto a la semana anterior
128 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Alta (8.1) | 1.2% | — | Octopus DeployOctopus Server | 1/5/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2019.1.0 through 2019.3.1 and 2019.4.0 through 2019.4.5, an authenticated user with the VariableViewUnscoped or VariableEditUnscoped permission scoped to a specific project could view or edit unscoped variables from a different project. (These permissions are only used in custom User Roles and do not… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.3% | — | Jenkins Octopusdeploy | 4/4/2019 | 17/6/2026 | Jenkins OctopusDeploy Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 1.0% | — | Jenkins Octopusdeploy | 20/2/2019 | 17/6/2026 | A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in Jenkins OctopusDeploy Plugin 1.8.1 and earlier in OctopusDeployPlugin.java that allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified URL and obtain the HTTP response code if successful, and exception error message otherwise. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 1.5% | — | Octopus DeployOctopus Server | 20/2/2019 | 17/6/2026 | An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 12% | 💥 Exploit | Octopus Server | 31/10/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2018.9.x before 2018.9.1, an authenticated user with permission to modify deployment processes could upload a maliciously crafted YAML configuration, potentially allowing for remote execution of arbitrary code, running in the same context as the Octopus Server (for self-hosted… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.79% | — | Octopus Deploy | 26/6/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.0 onwards (before 2018.6.7), an authenticated user with incorrect permissions may be able to create Accounts under the Infrastructure menu. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.93% | — | Octopus Server | 11/6/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy version 2018.5.1 to 2018.5.7, a user with Task View is able to view a password for a Service Fabric Cluster, when the Service Fabric Cluster target is configured in Azure Active Directory security mode and a deployment is executed with OctopusPrintVariables set to True. This is fixed in 2018.6.0. | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 1.4% | — | Octopus Server | 21/5/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.4.4 through 2018.5.1, Octopus variables that are sourced from the target do not have sensitive values obfuscated in the deployment logs. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.73% | — | Octopus Deploy | 1/5/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.4.x before 2018.4.7, an authenticated user is able to view/update/save variable values within the Tenant Variables area for Environments that do not exist within their associated Team scoping. This occurs in situations where this authenticated user also belongs to multiple teams, where one of the… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.3% | — | Octopus Deploy | 30/4/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy before 2018.4.7, target and tenant tag variable scopes were not checked against the list of tenants the user has access to. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 1.0% | — | Octopus Deploy | 27/3/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 2.0 and later before 2018.3.7, an authenticated user, with variable edit permissions, can scope some variables to targets greater than their permissions should allow. In other words, they can see machines beyond their team's scoped environments. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.9) | 0.96% | — | Belden Hirschmann Rs20-0900mmm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900nnm4tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900vvm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-1600l2l2sdau+130 | 6/3/2018 | 17/6/2026 | A Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information issue was discovered in Belden Hirschmann RS, RSR, RSB, MACH100, MACH1000, MACH4000, MS, and OCTOPUS Classic Platform Switches. A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability in the web interface has been identified, which may allow an attacker to… | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 2.8% | — | Belden Hirschmann Rs20-0900mmm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900nnm4tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900vvm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-1600l2l2sdau+130 | 6/3/2018 | 17/6/2026 | An Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts issue was discovered in Belden Hirschmann RS, RSR, RSB, MACH100, MACH1000, MACH4000, MS, and OCTOPUS Classic Platform Switches. An improper restriction of excessive authentication vulnerability in the web interface has been identified, which may allow an… | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 1.3% | — | Belden Hirschmann Rs20-0900mmm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900nnm4tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900vvm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-1600l2l2sdau+130 | 6/3/2018 | 17/6/2026 | An Information Exposure Through Query Strings in GET Request issue was discovered in Belden Hirschmann RS, RSR, RSB, MACH100, MACH1000, MACH4000, MS, and OCTOPUS Classic Platform Switches. An information exposure through query strings vulnerability in the web interface has been identified, which may allow an attacker… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.7% | — | Belden Hirschmann Rs20-0900mmm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900nnm4tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900vvm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-1600l2l2sdau+130 | 6/3/2018 | 17/6/2026 | A Session Fixation issue was discovered in Belden Hirschmann RS, RSR, RSB, MACH100, MACH1000, MACH4000, MS, and OCTOPUS Classic Platform Switches. A session fixation vulnerability in the web interface has been identified, which may allow an attacker to hijack web sessions. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.44% | — | Belden Hirschmann Rs20-0900mmm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900nnm4tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-0900vvm2tdauBelden Hirschmann Rs20-1600l2l2sdau+130 | 6/3/2018 | 17/6/2026 | An Inadequate Encryption Strength issue was discovered in Belden Hirschmann RS, RSR, RSB, MACH100, MACH1000, MACH4000, MS, and OCTOPUS Classic Platform Switches. An inadequate encryption strength vulnerability in the web interface has been identified, which may allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information through… | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.0% | — | Octopus Deploy | 16/1/2018 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy before 4.1.9. Any user with user editing permissions can modify teams to give themselves Administer System permissions even if they didn't have them, as demonstrated by use of the RoleEdit or TeamEdit permission. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.1% | — | Octopus Deploy | 3/1/2018 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy versions 3.2.11 - 4.1.5 (fixed in 4.1.6), an authenticated user with ProcessEdit permission could reference an Azure account in such a way as to bypass the scoping restrictions, resulting in a potential escalation of privileges. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 1.1% | — | Octopus Deploy | 13/12/2017 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy before 4.1.3, the machine update process doesn't check that the user has access to all environments. This allows an access-control bypass because the set of environments to which a machine is scoped may include environments in which the user lacks access. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.78% | — | Octopus Deploy | 14/11/2017 | 17/6/2026 | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the All Variables tab in Octopus Deploy 3.4.0-3.13.6 (fixed in 3.13.7) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Variable Set Name parameter. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.77% | — | Octopus Deploy | 13/11/2017 | 17/6/2026 | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Octopus Deploy 3.7.0-3.17.13 (fixed in 3.17.14) allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Step Template Name parameter. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.73% | — | Octopus Deploy | 19/10/2017 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus before 3.17.7, an authenticated user who was explicitly granted the permission to invite new users (aka UserInvite) can invite users to teams with escalated privileges. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.60% | — | Octopus Deploy | 19/10/2017 | 17/6/2026 | An issue was discovered in Octopus before 3.17.7. When the special Guest user account is granted the CertificateExportPrivateKey permission, and Guest Access is enabled for the Octopus Server, an attacker can sign in as the Guest account and export Certificates managed by Octopus, including the private key. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 0.81% | — | Octopus Deploy | 19/10/2017 | 17/6/2026 | Octopus before 3.17.7 allows attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information by reading a variable JSON file in certain situations involving Offline Drop Targets. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.7) | 1.2% | — | Octopus DeployOctopus Server | 17/7/2017 | 17/6/2026 | In Octopus Deploy 3.x before 3.15.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted NuGet package, potentially overwriting other packages or modifying system files. This is a directory traversal in the PackageId value. |