Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2768▼ 546 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1325▼ 174 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)268▼ 241 respecto a la semana anterior
108 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modificada | Media (4.3) | 0.66% | — | Redhat Descision ManagerRedhat JbpmRedhat Process Automation | 1/6/2021 | 17/6/2026 | A flaw was found in the BPMN editor in version jBPM 7.51.0.Final. Any authenticated user from any project can see the name of Ruleflow Groups from other projects, despite the user not having access to those projects. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 1.1% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 7/5/2021 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11.0 could allow an attacker on the network to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service through username enumeration. IBM X-Force ID: 190992. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.4) | 1.3% | — | Redhat Kubernetes-clientRedhat A-mq OnlineRedhat Build OF QuarkusRedhat Codeready Studio+5 | 16/3/2021 | 17/6/2026 | A flaw was found in the fabric8 kubernetes-client in version 4.2.0 and after. This flaw allows a malicious pod/container to cause applications using the fabric8 kubernetes-client `copy` command to extract files outside the working path. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to integrity and system… | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.5% | — | Redhat Wildfly ElytronRedhat Codeready StudioRedhat Descision ManagerRedhat Jboss Fuse+2 | 23/9/2020 | 17/6/2026 | A flaw was found in WildFly Elytron version 1.11.3.Final and before. When using WildFly Elytron FORM authentication with a session ID in the URL, an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.5) | 1.4% | — | Redhat Wildfly ElytronRedhat Decision ManagerRedhat Process Automation | 16/9/2020 | 17/6/2026 | A flaw was found in all supported versions before wildfly-elytron-1.6.8.Final-redhat-00001, where the WildFlySecurityManager checks were bypassed when using custom security managers, resulting in an improper authorization. This flaw leads to information exposure by unauthenticated access to secure resources. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 2.6% | — | Redhat KeycloakRedhat Decision ManagerRedhat Jboss FuseRedhat Openshift Application Runtimes+3 | 13/5/2020 | 17/6/2026 | A flaw was found in Keycloak before version 11.0.0, where the code base contains usages of ObjectInputStream without type checks. This flaw allows an attacker to inject arbitrarily serialized Java Objects, which would then get deserialized in a privileged context and potentially lead to remote code execution. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.5) | 0.29% | — | Redhat Decision ManagerRedhat Process Automation Manager | 5/3/2020 | 17/6/2026 | A vulnerability was found in business-central, as shipped in rhdm-7.5.1 and rhpam-7.5.1, where encoded passwords are stored in errai_security_context. The encoding used for storing the passwords is Base64, not an encryption algorithm, and any recovery of these passwords could lead to user passwords being exposed. | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 5.6% | — | Fasterxml Jackson-databindRedhat Decision ManagerRedhat Jboss Data GridRedhat Jboss Enterprise Application Platform+4 | 2/3/2020 | 17/6/2026 | A flaw was discovered in jackson-databind in versions before 2.9.10, 2.8.11.5 and 2.6.7.3, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of a malicious object using commons-configuration 1 and 2 JNDI classes. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.1) | 1.2% | — | AngularjsRedhat Decision ManagerRedhat Process Automation | 2/1/2020 | 17/6/2026 | There is a vulnerability in all angular versions before 1.5.0-beta.0, where after escaping the context of the web application, the web application delivers data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. | |
| Modificada | Media (6.1) | 2.1% | — | Knockoutjs KnockoutRedhat Decision ManagerRedhat Process AutomationOracle Business Intelligence+1 | 2/1/2020 | 17/6/2026 | There is a vulnerability in knockout before version 3.5.0-beta, where after escaping the context of the web application, the web application delivers data to its users along with other trusted dynamic content, without validating it. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.3) | 1.4% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information due to missing authentication in Ignite nodes. IBM X-Force ID: 161412. | |
| Modificada | Crítica (9.8) | 2.0% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 161411. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.5) | 0.28% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow a local user to obtain highly sensitive information from log files when debugging is enabled. IBM X-Force ID: 160765. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.1) | 0.32% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 uses a high privileged PostgreSQL account for database access which could allow a local user to perform actions they should not have privileges to execute. IBM X-Force ID: 160764. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 1.1% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct an LDAP injection. By using a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to make unauthorized queries or modify the LDAP content. IBM X-Force ID: 160761. | |
| Modificada | Baja (3.3) | 0.30% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 information disclosure could allow a local user to obtain e-mail contents from the client debug log file. IBM X-Force ID: 160759. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.9) | 1.1% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 1/7/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow an attacker with specialized access to obtain highly sensitive from the credential vault. IBM X-Force ID: 160758. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 2.2% | — | Blueprism Robotic Process Automation | 24/5/2019 | 17/6/2026 | In AutomateAppCore.dll in Blue Prism Robotic Process Automation 6.4.0.8445, a vulnerability in access control can be exploited to escalate privileges. The vulnerability allows for abusing the application for fraud or unauthorized access to certain information. The attack requires a valid user account to connect to the… | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.97% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 14/3/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152671. | |
| Modificada | Media (4.9) | 2.5% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 21/2/2019 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to upload arbitrary files to the system. IBM X-Force ID: 155008. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.3) | 1.3% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could disclose sensitive information in a web request that could aid in future attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 151714. | |
| Modificada | Alta (7.8) | 0.24% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could store highly sensitive information in the form of unencrypted passwords that would be available to a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 151713. | |
| Modificada | Media (5.5) | 0.37% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 11 could under certain cases, display the password in a Control Room log file after installation. IBM X-Force ID: 151707. | |
| Modificada | Alta (8.8) | 2.9% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 2/11/2018 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere 10.0 and 11.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a missing restriction in which file types can be uploaded to the control room. By uploading a malicious file and tricking a victim to run it, an attacker could exploit this… | |
| Modificada | Media (5.4) | 0.66% | — | IBM Robotic Process Automation With Automation Anywhere | 5/10/2018 | 17/6/2026 | IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere Enterprise 10 is vulnerable to persistent cross-site scripting, caused by missing escaping of a database field. An attacker that has access to the Control Room database could exploit this vulnerability to execute script in a victim's web browser within the… |