Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas2827▼ 257 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1324▼ 180 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)6▼ 1 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)214▼ 107 respecto a la semana anterior
–

9598 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
AnalizadaMedia (4.3)0.34%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify data in certain SQL tables due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
AnalizadaCrítica (9.8)0.80%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.
AnalizadaAlta (8.8)0.75%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands and obtain sensitive information due to improper privilege management.
AnalizadaMedia (4.3)0.45%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to add unexpected parameters to a command due to parameter injection.
AnalizadaCrítica (9.8)0.86%—IBM DB2 Mirror FOR I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
AnalizadaAlta (7.5)0.55%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper handling of zero-length TCP options.
AnalizadaAlta (7.6)0.57%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper bounds checking.
AnalizadaAlta (8.8)0.79%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, and 7.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
AnalizadaAlta (8.1)0.52%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper privilege management during monitor owner reassignment.
AnalizadaAlta (7.7)0.47%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an out-of-bounds read.
AnalizadaCrítica (9.9)0.75%—IBM I12/8/202613/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an uncontrolled search path element.
AnalizadaAlta (8.8)0.50%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, and 7.5 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
AnalizadaCrítica (9.8)0.25%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to harvest credentials due to spoofing of Navigator for i.
AnalizadaAlta (8.8)0.66%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 is vulnerable to privilege escalation via Navigator for i. An authenticated user could elevate privileges to a root user to execute commands.
AnalizadaAlta (8.1)0.42%—IBM Websphere Application Server12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation when using Liberty collectives.
AnalizadaMedia (4.3)0.32%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to an interpretation conflict in the multipart parser.
AnalizadaMedia (4.3)0.32%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
AnalizadaMedia (4.3)0.50%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-supplied path input.
AnalizadaAlta (8.1)0.25%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and compromise system integrity due to an XML injection flaw.
AnalizadaAlta (8.3)0.54%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to unsafe reflection.
AnalizadaAlta (7.1)0.54%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and manipulate files due to a path traversal vulnerability.
AnalizadaMedia (5.4)0.23%—IBM I12/8/202617/8/2026
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Pendiente de análisisAlta (8.2)0.37%—IBM UefiAI12/8/202631/8/2026
In an UEFI, Lack of verified boot to certain FV may cause arbitrary code execution.
AnalizadaCrítica (9.8)0.34%—IBM Application Gateway Operator5/8/202610/8/2026
IBM Application Gateway Operator 22.2 through 26.06 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient validation of URLs specified in custom resources.
AnalizadaCrítica (9.8)0.48%—IBM Websphere Application Server5/8/202610/8/2026
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5, and 9.0 and IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty Continuous delivery has a flaw in the ORB component in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition, may allow a malicious IIOP server to induce loading and instantation of arbitrary classes.