Vulnerabilidades

Various Lexmark products have stored XSS in the embedded web server used in older generation Lexmark devices. Affected products are available in http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content&id=TE935&locale=en&userlocale=EN_US.

Various Lexmark products have reflected XSS in the embedded web server used in older generation Lexmark devices. Affected products are available in http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content&id=TE935&locale=en&userlocale=EN_US.

Lexmark printer MS812 and multiple older generation Lexmark devices have a stored XSS vulnerability in the embedded web server. The vulnerability can be exploited to expose session credentials and other information via the users web browser.

Directory traversal vulnerability in the ReportDownloadServlet servlet in Lexmark MarkVision Enterprise before 2.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.

Directory traversal vulnerability in the GfdFileUploadServerlet servlet in Lexmark MarkVision Enterprise before 2.1 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.

In Lexmark Services Monitor 2.27.4.0.39 (running on TCP port 2070), a remote attacker can use a directory traversal technique using /../../../ or ..%2F..%2F..%2F to obtain local files on the host operating system.

Various Lexmark products have a Buffer Overflow (issue 3 of 3).

Various Lexmark products have a Buffer Overflow (issue 2 of 3).

Various Lexmark printers contain a denial of service vulnerability in the SNMP service that can be exploited to crash the device.

Various Lexmark products have an Integer Overflow.

The legacy finger service (TCP port 79) is enabled by default on various older Lexmark devices.

Various Lexmark products have CSRF.

Various Lexmark products have Incorrect Access Control (issue 2 of 2).

Various Lexmark products have Incorrect Access Control (issue 1 of 2).

Various Lexmark products have Incorrect Access Control.

Various Lexmark devices have a Buffer Overflow (issue 1 of 2).

Various Lexmark devices have a Buffer Overflow (issue 2 of 2).

On certain Lexmark devices that communicate with an LDAP or SMTP server, a malicious administrator can discover LDAP or SMTP credentials by changing that server's hostname to one that they control, and then capturing the credentials that are sent there. This occurs because stored credentials are not automatically…

Certain Lexmark CX, MX, X, XC, XM, XS, and 6500e devices before 2019-02-11 allow remote attackers to erase stored shortcuts.

Lexmark Scan To Network (SNF) 3.2.9 and earlier stores network configuration credentials in plaintext and transmits them in requests, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via requests to (1) cgi-bin/direct/printer/prtappauth/apps/snfDestServlet or (2)…

An exploitable code execution vulnerability exists in the image rendering functionality of Lexmark Perceptive Document Filters 11.3.0.2400. A specifically crafted PDF can cause a function call on a corrupted DCTStream to occur, resulting in user controlled data being written to the stack. A maliciously crafted PDF…

An exploitable use-after-free exists in the PDF parsing functionality of Lexmark Perspective Document Filters 11.3.0.2400 and 11.4.0.2452. A crafted PDF document can lead to a use-after-free resulting in direct code execution.

An exploitable arbitrary read exists in the XLS parsing of the Lexmark Perspective Document Filters conversion functionality. A crafted XLS document can lead to a arbitrary read resulting in memory disclosure. The vulnerability was confirmed on versions 11.3.0.2228 and 11.3.0.2400

An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the Compound Binary File Format (CBFF) parser functionality of Lexmark Perceptive Document Filters library. A specially crafted CBFF file can cause a code execution. An attacker can send a malformed file to trigger this vulnerability.

An exploitable out-of-bounds write exists in the Bzip2 parsing of the Lexmark Perspective Document Filters conversion functionality. A crafted Bzip2 document can lead to a stack-based buffer overflow causing an out-of-bounds write which under the right circumstance could potentially be leveraged by an attacker to gain…