Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas3027▼ 69 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1424▲ 58 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)382▼ 128 respecto a la semana anterior
–

30 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
ModificadaAlta (8.6)1.4%—EMC Avamar Server21/9/201617/6/2026
Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) in EMC Avamar Server before 7.3.0-233 use the same encryption key across different customers' installations, which allows remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms and obtain sensitive client-server traffic information by leveraging…
ModificadaCrítica (9.1)3.4%—EMC Avamar Server21/9/201617/6/2026
Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) in EMC Avamar Server before 7.3.0-233 rely on client-side authentication, which allows remote attackers to spoof clients and read backup data via a modified client agent.
ModificadaAlta (7.8)2.7%—EMC Avamar ServerEMC Avamar Server Virtual Edition23/7/201517/6/2026
Directory traversal vulnerability in EMC Avamar Server 7.x before 7.1.2 and Avamar Virtual Addition (AVE) 7.x before 7.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by using the Avamar Desktop/Laptop client interface to send crafted parameters.
ModificadaMedia (4.3)0.81%—EMC Avamar ServerEMC Avamar Server Virtual Edition19/7/201316/6/2026
EMC Avamar Server and Avamar Virtual Edition before 7.0 on Data Store Gen3, Gen4, and Gen4s platforms do not properly restrict use of FRAME elements, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted web site, related to "cross frame scripting vulnerabilities."
ModificadaAlta (9)3.1%—EMC Avamar ServerEMC Avamar Server Virtual Edition19/7/201316/6/2026
EMC Avamar Server and Avamar Virtual Edition before 7.0 on Data Store Gen3, Gen4, and Gen4s platforms do not properly determine authorization for calls to Java RMI methods, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.