Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2987▼ 96 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1458▲ 101 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)350▼ 160 respecto a la semana anterior
2803 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analizada | Crítica (9.8) | 0.51% | — | IBM Financial Transaction Manager | 22/9/2026 | 6/10/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper deserialization of untrusted data. | |
| Analizada | Crítica (9.8) | 0.48% | — | IBM Financial Transaction Manager | 22/9/2026 | 6/10/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input within the new Function constructor. | |
| Analizada | Media (4.3) | 0.20% | — | IBM Financial Transaction Manager | 22/9/2026 | 6/10/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to falsify transaction audit logs due to improper validation of a client-supplied HTTP header. | |
| En análisis | Media (6.5) | 0.24% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security controls by forging user identities due to improper authorization. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8) | 0.17% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded or predictable cryptographic key. | |
| En análisis | Media (5.4) | 0.14% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authentication tags due to the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys and initialization vectors. | |
| En análisis | Alta (7.4) | 0.12% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.1) | 0.30% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary ESQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an ESQL command. | |
| En análisis | Alta (7.5) | 0.13% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | |
| En análisis | Media (5.4) | 0.30% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify server files due to path traversal. | |
| En análisis | Media (6.5) | 0.21% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.2) | 0.25% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input. | |
| En análisis | Media (6.5) | 0.10% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | |
| En análisis | Alta (7.6) | 0.19% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input. | |
| En análisis | Media (6.5) | 0.24% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper path canonicalization. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.5) | 0.42% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.2) | 0.41% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization. | |
| En análisis | Alta (7.9) | 0.10% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and trigger unauthorized actions due to server-side request forgery. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.8) | 0.22% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to the inclusion of functionality from an untrusted control sphere. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.5) | 0.29% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. | |
| En análisis | Crítica (9.1) | 0.38% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.8) | 0.10% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and modify transaction data due to the use of hard-coded credentials. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.8) | 0.10% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and perform unauthorized actions due to insufficiently protected credentials. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.8) | 0.24% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow an adjacent-network attacker to execute arbitrary code due to deserialization of untrusted data. | |
| En análisis | Alta (8.8) | 0.50% | — | IBM Financial Transaction ManagerAIRedhat OpenshiftAI | 22/9/2026 | 23/9/2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of a specified quantity. |