Vulnerabilidades
Resumen — últimos 7 días
Vulnerabilidades nuevas2738▼ 488 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1301▼ 189 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)229▼ 273 respecto a la semana anterior
9126 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)
| CVE | Estado | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Tecnologías afectadas | Publicada ▼ | Modificada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aplazada | Crítica (9.3) | 0.35% | — | Yarbo Android ApplicationAIYarbo IOS ApplicationAI | 12/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | The Yarbo Android and iOS applications contain hard-coded MQTT broker credentials that are identical for all users and all devices. These credentials are embedded in the application binary and are readily extractable via APK decompilation. The credentials provide access to cloud MQTT brokers carrying real-time… | |
| Pendiente de análisis | Media (5.1) | 0.29% | — | Lenovo Android ApplicationAI | 10/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | A vulnerability was identified in the Lenovo Android Application, distributed exclusively on tablets in the Chinese market, that could allow a website visited by the built-in browser to overwrite system clipboard contents. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.9) | 0.10% | — | Samsung Android USB Driver | 5/6/2026 | 30/6/2026 | Improper input validation in Samsung Android USB Driver for Windows prior to version 1.9.5.0 allows local attacker to access out-of-bounds memory. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.2) | 0.09% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper authorization in AppBlock prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to launch arbitrary activity. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.4) | 0.09% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper access control in MediaTek Audio HAL prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger privileged functions. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.8) | 0.09% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper export of android application components in Galaxy Editing Service prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to execute privileged operations. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.1) | 0.09% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper access control in AuditLogService prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. | |
| Analizada | Media (4.8) | 0.08% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper export of android application components in ImsSettings prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger logging function. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.4) | 0.09% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper export of android application components in SpriteWallpaper prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access to sensitive information. | |
| Analizada | Media (6.9) | 0.09% | — | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Incorrect privilege assignment in Telephony prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. | |
| Analizada | Media (4.6) | 0.09% | 💥 PoC | Samsung Android | 5/6/2026 | 17/6/2026 | Improper handling of insufficient privileges in SecTelephonyProvider prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access privileged files. | |
| Analizada | Baja (3.3) | 0.08% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible missing permission check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Modificada | Media (4) | 0.09% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 8/9/2026 | In fixInitiatingUserIfNecessary of CallIntentProcessor.java, there is a possible way to make an emergency call due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.10% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In multiple functions, there is a possible desync in persistence due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Media (5.5) | 0.09% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.09% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In addWindow of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.07% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In Load of LoadedArsc.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.07% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In onNullBinding of HostEmulationManager.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.07% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In getCallingPackageName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to bypass activity start restrictions due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (8) | 0.12% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass user interaction when pairing an LE device due to a logic error. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.07% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In getAppLabel of ForgetDeviceDialogFragment.java, there is a possible trick the user into forgetting a device due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (8) | 0.11% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In l2c_fcr_clone_buf of l2c_fcr.cc, there is a possible way to trigger controlled heap corruption within the privileged Bluetooth process due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.06% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In getApplicationLabel of KeyChainActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving access to certificates due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.07% | — | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible misleading UI due to obfuscation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |
| Analizada | Alta (7.8) | 0.07% | 💥 PoC | Google Android | 1/6/2026 | 22/7/2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |