Vulnerabilidades

Resumen — últimos 7 días

Vulnerabilidades nuevas2862▼ 326 respecto a la semana anterior
Críticas / altas1389▼ 28 respecto a la semana anterior
Nueva explotación activa (KEV)4▼ 5 respecto a la semana anterior
Sin puntuar (sin CVSS)293▼ 216 respecto a la semana anterior
–

9523 resultados, ordenados por fecha de publicación (más recientes primero)

CVEEstadoSeveridadEPSS Explotación activaTecnologías afectadasPublicada ▼Modificada Descripción
RecibidaAlta (8.3)——IBM Langflow OSSAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or inject malicious data due to improper access control in the vertex result caching subsystem.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('Code Injection') related to improper input validation.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper input validation.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in code, resulting in a sandbox escape.
RecibidaAlta (8.1)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('Code Injection'), aka improper control of code generation.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM Langflow OSSAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper input validation.
RecibidaMedia (6.5)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a path traversal vulnerability.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an incomplete blocklist in the code security scanner.
RecibidaMedia (4.3)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption during ZIP file extraction.
RecibidaAlta (7.6)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization.
RecibidaAlta (7.7)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an expected dependency confusion.
RecibidaCrítica (9.8)—💥 PoCIBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
RecibidaAlta (8.5)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation.
RecibidaMedia (6.5)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
RecibidaAlta (7.5)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow an attacker with access to the server secret and Redis write access to submit a malicious serialized cache value. When the value was retrieved, deserialization could have executed attacker-controlled code with the privileges of the service process.
RecibidaAlta (8.1)——IBM Langflow OSSAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code.
RecibidaAlta (7.5)——IBM Langflow OSSAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in code.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation.
RecibidaCrítica (9.8)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation.
RecibidaAlta (8.1)——IBM Langflow OSSAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
RecibidaAlta (7.7)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials.
RecibidaMedia (6.5)——IBM LangflowAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper access control.
RecibidaAlta (8.8)——IBM Langflow OSSAI6/10/20266/10/2026
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper access control.
AplazadaAlta (8.5)——LibmikmodAI6/10/20266/10/2026
libmikmod before 3.3.14 contains an integer overflow in the Oktalyzer loader OKT_doPBOD() that allows attackers to cause heap buffer overflow via crafted track counts. Attackers can supply an OKT module whose SLEN chunk wraps the 16-bit numtrk value, causing PBOD writes past allocated track pointers for crashes or…
Orbitaley — Vulnerabilidades