CVE-2026-90651
Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY='false' and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY='false', and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain.
Leer descripción completaMostrar menos
An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true.
CVSS
- Versión: 3.1
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
- Puntuación base: 8.1
Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)
- Probabilidad de explotación en los próximos 30 días: 0.21%
- Percentil entre todas las CVEs puntuadas: 10
- Fecha de la puntuación: 6/10/2026
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).
🎯 Técnicas ATT&CK
Cómo se explota esta vulnerabilidad y qué consigue el atacante, en el lenguaje de MITRE ATT&CK.
- Explotación
T1190Exploit Public-Facing Applicationinitial access85 % - Impacto principal
T1557Adversary-in-the-Middlecredential access · collection90 % - Impacto secundario
T1565.002Transmitted Data Manipulationimpact80 %
Vulnerabilidad de verificación TLS deshabilitada por defecto en Socket Firewall expuesto en red (AV:N). Atacante en posición de interceptar tráfico (MITM/T1557) puede alterar respuestas del registry o API, modificando decisiones del firewall e inyectando contenido malicioso (T1565.002). CWE-295 conf
Inferido por nuestro agente de análisis a partir de la descripción oficial, el vector CVSS y la CWE, y comprobado por un supervisor. Puede contener errores.
🛡️ Mitigaciones ATT&CK que cubren estas técnicas
Tecnologías afectadas (2)
⚠ Inferidas por IA a partir de la descripción — NVD aún no ha analizado esta CVE; no son CPE verificados.
CWE
- CWE-295
Referencias
JSON original (NVD)
Mostrar
{
"id": "CVE-2026-90651",
"cveTags": [],
"metrics": {
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-90651",
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"version": "2.0.3",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T14:56:54.408892Z"
}
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"cvssData": {
"scope": "CHANGED",
"version": "3.1",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW"
},
"impactScore": 5.3,
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2
}
]
},
"affected": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"affectedData": [
{
"vendor": "Socket",
"modules": [
"registry mode; outbound TLS to Socket API and upstream package registries (OpenResty/Lua HTTP client)"
],
"product": "Socket Firewall",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"lessThan": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
],
"packageName": "socketdev/socket-registry-firewall",
"collectionURL": "https://hub.docker.com",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected"
}
]
}
],
"published": "2026-09-13T00:17:07.203",
"references": [
{
"url": "https://docs.socket.dev/docs/registry-mode-configuration-reference",
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/SocketDev/socket-registry-firewall/releases/tag/v2.0.0",
"source": "cve@mitre.org"
}
],
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY='false' and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY='false', and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true."
}
],
"lastModified": "2026-09-22T20:00:03.713",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org"
}