CVE-2024-47825
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10.
Leer descripción completaMostrar menos
As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`.
CVSS
- Versión: 3.1
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Puntuación base: 8.7
Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)
- Probabilidad de explotación en los próximos 30 días: 0.40%
- Percentil entre todas las CVEs puntuadas: 32
- Fecha de la puntuación: 6/10/2026
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).
🎯 Técnicas ATT&CK
Cómo se explota esta vulnerabilidad y qué consigue el atacante, en el lenguaje de MITRE ATT&CK.
- Explotación
T1190Exploit Public-Facing Applicationinitial access60 % - Impacto principal
T1222File and Directory Permissions Modificationdefense impairment55 %
Inferido por reglas deterministas a partir del vector CVSS y la CWE. Solo orientativo.
🛡️ Mitigaciones ATT&CK que cubren estas técnicas
Tecnologías afectadas (1)
CWE
- CWE-276
- NVD-CWE-noinfo
Referencias
JSON original (NVD)
Mostrar
{
"id": "CVE-2024-47825",
"cveTags": [],
"metrics": {
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-47825",
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"version": "2.0.3",
"timestamp": "2024-10-21T19:58:00.432301Z"
}
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"cvssData": {
"scope": "CHANGED",
"version": "3.1",
"baseScore": 4,
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW"
},
"impactScore": 1.4,
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2
},
{
"type": "Primary",
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"cvssData": {
"scope": "CHANGED",
"version": "3.1",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"impactScore": 5.8,
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2
}
]
},
"affected": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"affectedData": [
{
"vendor": "cilium",
"product": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": ">= 1.15.0, < 1.15.10"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": ">= 1.14.0, < 1.14.16"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"affectedData": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"vendor": "cilium",
"product": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.15.0",
"lessThan": "1.15.10",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.14.0",
"lessThan": "1.14.16",
"versionType": "custom"
}
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown"
}
]
}
],
"published": "2024-10-21T19:15:03.500",
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"type": "Secondary",
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-276"
}
]
},
{
"type": "Primary",
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.16 and 1.15.10, a policy rule denying a prefix that is broader than `/32` may be ignored if there is a policy rule referencing a more narrow prefix (`CIDRSet` or `toFQDN`) and this narrower policy rule specifies either `enableDefaultDeny: false` or `- toEntities: all`. Note that a rule specifying `toEntities: world` or `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` is insufficient, it must be to entity `all`.This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.16 and v1.15.10. As this issue only affects policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false` or that set `toEntities` to `all`, some workarounds are available. For users with policies using `enableDefaultDeny: false`, remove this configuration option and explicitly define any allow rules required. For users with egress policies that explicitly specify `toEntities: all`, use `toEntities: world`."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Cilium es una solución de redes, observabilidad y seguridad con un plano de datos basado en eBPF. A partir de la versión 1.14.0 y antes de las versiones 1.14.16 y 1.15.10, una regla de política que deniegue un prefijo más amplio que `/32` puede ignorarse si hay una regla de política que haga referencia a un prefijo más estrecho (`CIDRSet` o `toFQDN`) y esta regla de política más estrecha especifica `enableDefaultDeny: false` o `- toEntities: all`. Tenga en cuenta que una regla que especifique `toEntities: world` o `toEntities: 0.0.0.0/0` no es suficiente, debe ser para la entidad `all`. Este problema se ha corregido en Cilium v1.14.16 y v1.15.10. Como este problema solo afecta a las políticas que utilizan `enableDefaultDeny: false` o que establecen `toEntities` en `all`, hay algunas soluciones alternativas disponibles. Para los usuarios con políticas que utilizan `enableDefaultDeny: false`, elimine esta opción de configuración y defina explícitamente las reglas de permiso requeridas. Para los usuarios con políticas de salida que especifican explícitamente `toEntities: all`, utilice `toEntities: world`."
}
],
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:57:49.363",
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"negate": false,
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true,
"matchCriteriaId": "E72A812D-F216-4165-A98F-AAF9042ECE26",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.14.16",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.14.0"
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true,
"matchCriteriaId": "430A4DEE-E609-4186-A882-E0E424D6F232",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.15.10",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.15.0"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com"
}