« Volver al listado

CVE-2010-3192

Estado: ModificadaMedia (5)—

Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.

CVSS

Probabilidad de explotación (EPSS)

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System, de FIRST) estima la probabilidad de que una vulnerabilidad sea explotada en 30 días. Complementa a CVSS (impacto) y a CISA KEV (explotación confirmada).

Tecnologías afectadas (1)

GNU — Glibc

CWE

Referencias

JSON original (NVD)

Mostrar
{
  "id": "CVE-2010-3192",
  "cveTags": [],
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "type": "Primary",
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "cvssData": {
          "version": "2.0",
          "baseScore": 5,
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "accessComplexity": "LOW",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL"
        },
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "exploitabilityScore": 10,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "userInteractionRequired": false
      }
    ]
  },
  "affected": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "product": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "published": "2010-10-14T05:58:06.833",
  "references": [
    {
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "cve@mitre.org"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List",
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    },
    {
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5",
      "tags": [
        "Mailing List"
      ],
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"
    }
  ],
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "type": "Primary",
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-200"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Algunos mecanismos run-time de protección de memoria en la Librería C de GNU (también conocido como glibc o libc6) print argv[0] y backtrace information, lo cual permite a atacantes dependientes del contexto obtener información sensible de procesos de memoria mediante la ejecución de un programa incorrecto, como el demostrado por un programa setuid que contiene un error de desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila, relacionado con la función __fortify_fail en debug/fortify_fail.c, y las implementaciones __stack_chk_fail (también conocida como stack protection) y __chk_fail (también conocida como FORTIFY_SOURCE)."
    }
  ],
  "lastModified": "2026-06-16T23:22:20.710",
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "negate": false,
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "vulnerable": true,
              "matchCriteriaId": "D4B57CAA-FEDE-48A6-A22F-56CAEA79F200",
              "versionEndExcluding": "2.26"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org"
}