Altran
Altran Picotcp: vulnerabilidades y CVE
Altran Picotcp tiene 13 vulnerabilidades publicadas, 0 de ellas en los últimos 12 meses. 5 son críticas y 0 figuran en el catálogo de explotación activa de CISA.
CVE13
Últimos 12 meses0
Críticas5
Explotadas activamente0
Todas las vulnerabilidades en el catálogo →⭐ Seguir esta tecnología
Últimas vulnerabilidades
| CVE | Severidad | EPSS | Explotación activa | Publicada | Descripción |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-30463 | Alta (7.5) | 0.87% | — | 19 abr 2023 | Altran picoTCP through 1.7.0 allows memory corruption (and subsequent denial of service) because of an integer overflow in pico_ipv6_alloc when processing large ICMPv6 packets. This affects installations with Ethernet… |
| CVE-2021-33304 | Crítica (9.8) | 0.84% | — | 15 feb 2023 | Double Free vulnerability in virtualsquare picoTCP v1.7.0 and picoTCP-NG v2.1 in modules/pico_fragments.c in function pico_fragments_reassemble, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2020-24341 | Crítica (9.1) | 5.0% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. The TCP input data processing function in pico_tcp.c does not validate the length of incoming TCP packets, which leads to an out-of-bounds read when… |
| CVE-2020-24340 | Alta (7.5) | 2.9% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. The code that processes DNS responses in pico_mdns_handle_data_as_answers_generic() in pico_mdns.c does not check whether the number of answers/responses… |
| CVE-2020-24339 | Alta (7.5) | 2.8% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. The DNS domain name record decompression functionality in pico_dns_decompress_name() in pico_dns_common.c does not validate the compression pointer offset… |
| CVE-2020-24338 | Crítica (9.8) | 37% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP through 1.7.0. The DNS domain name record decompression functionality in pico_dns_decompress_name() in pico_dns_common.c does not validate the compression pointer offset values with… |
| CVE-2020-24337 | Alta (7.5) | 2.9% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP and picoTCP-NG through 1.7.0. When an unsupported TCP option with zero length is provided in an incoming TCP packet, it is possible to cause a Denial-of-Service by achieving an… |
| CVE-2020-17445 | Alta (7.5) | 2.9% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 destination options does not check for a valid length of the destination options header. This results in an Out-of-Bounds Read, and, depending… |
| CVE-2020-17444 | Alta (7.5) | 2.8% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The routine for processing the next header field (and deducing whether the IPv6 extension headers are valid) doesn't check whether the header extension length field would… |
| CVE-2020-17443 | Alta (7.5) | 2.8% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for creating an ICMPv6 echo replies doesn't check whether the ICMPv6 echo request packet's size is shorter than 8 bytes. If the size of the incoming ICMPv6 request… |
| CVE-2020-17442 | Alta (7.5) | 3.1% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for parsing the hop-by-hop IPv6 extension headers does not validate the bounds of the extension header length value, which may result in Integer Wraparound. Therefore,… |
| CVE-2020-17441 | Crítica (9.1) | 7.0% | — | 11 dic 2020 | An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The code for processing the IPv6 headers does not validate whether the IPv6 payload length field is equal to the actual size of the payload, which leads to an Out-of-Bounds read… |
| CVE-2017-1000210 | Crítica (9.8) | 2.2% | — | 17 nov 2017 | picoTCP (versions 1.7.0 - 1.5.0) is vulnerable to stack buffer overflow resulting in code execution or denial of service attack |